ChaseDream

标题: OG 39现在分词的使用?以前没问过,期待高手 [打印本页]

作者: tweib    时间: 2004-8-7 19:04
标题: OG 39现在分词的使用?以前没问过,期待高手

39.   For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment, a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.


(A) a method to protect


(B) as a method protecting


(C) protecting


(D) as a protection ofC


(E) to protect


找了很多,对C中protecting的作用还是不很清晰,期待提醒


现在分词单独放在句末,在OG中一般都是做伴随状语,根据OG解释Choice C is best because the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did.我怎么感觉protecting象是做定语了,即explains what the shields did,


不然伴随状语能够explains what the shields did???


作者: tweib    时间: 2004-8-7 21:57

up up



作者: LES    时间: 2004-8-7 22:42

现在分词短语用作状语,表时间、原因、结果、条件、让步、方式或伴随情况。

-《英语语法》薄冰(袖珍本)P336


作者: tweib    时间: 2004-8-7 23:41

回复les:


1、现在分词前有“,”优先做状语,


2、现在分词前有“,”也可以做定语,但在ETS题里,只有....n., including...结构


我也是不敢认为这里的protesting是定语,修饰前面句子主语,因为一旦有这个先例,以后所有的现在分词选项都会对的!


试着用前人一句话,来自我安慰:正确选项中的protecting在这里是修饰整个句子animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment,即指明用途。



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-8 0:00:54编辑过]

作者: tweib    时间: 2004-8-8 00:47

试着用前人一句话,来自我安慰:正确选项中的protecting在这里是修饰整个句子animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment,即指明用途。



想来想去,还是觉得上面的话不对头!整句话内容不能导致,protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears !

而且找到了一些实际例子,确实分词可以做定语!这里的protecting还是与including一样做定语


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-8 0:51:47编辑过]

作者: LES    时间: 2004-8-8 01:02
以下是引用tweib在2004-8-8 0:47:00的发言:


试着用前人一句话,来自我安慰:正确选项中的protecting在这里是修饰整个句子animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment,即指明用途。



想来想去,还是觉得上面的话不对头!整句话内容不能导致,protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears !


而且找到了一些实际例子,确实分词可以做定语!这里的protecting还是与including一样做定语




这里两者绝对都不是定语!


相反,两者都是作状语。


protecting 作状语修饰主句的主语,表原因,参考上面偶引用的语法说明。


including 是介词化的现在分词(语法上称作participle preposition),也是作状语修饰前面最近的名词。


判断是否为定语其实很简单,翻译一下,看看能不能翻成“......的”。


作者: tweib    时间: 2004-8-8 01:56
以下是引用LES在2004-8-8 1:02:00的发言:





including 是介词化的现在分词(语法上称作participle preposition),也是作状语修饰前面最近的名词。


除了上面的话有点不同意见外,其它的我只能敬仰!


提醒得太好了,我详述如下:


我们可以验证,因为分词作状语可以看作是从各类状语从句转换而来,例:




(If) Given more time and money, we could have completed the task. (条件状语)

(Although) gaining much money, he still felt unhappy. (让步状语)



对于表原因的状语依然可以用此方法:



(As)protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spearsanimal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment。这就很明显了!



但这里的为什么表原因的状语要置后,是为了平行不使句子笨重,因为句首已经有一长串介词结构做插入语。



再举一例,Many scientists urged government to adopt a number of policies to reverse a decline in the endangered birds ,including establishing new habitat for the birds----  


这里的including可以看作是方式状语?可能不行吧


总之,多亏了les MM


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-8 2:02:48编辑过]

作者: gmat700+    时间: 2004-8-8 02:04
以下是引用tweib在2004-8-8 1:56:00的发言:


除了上面的话有点不同意见外,其它的我只能敬仰!


提醒得太好了,我详述如下:


我们可以验证,因为分词作状语可以看作是从各类状语从句转换而来,例:




(If) Given more time and money, we could have completed the task. (条件状语)

(Although) gaining much money, he still felt unhappy. (让步状语)



对于表原因的状语依然可以用此方法:



(As)protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spearsanimal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment。这就很明显了!



但这里的为什么表原因的状语要置后,是为了平行不使句子笨重,因为句首已经有一长串介词结构做插入语。



再举一例,Many scientists urged government to adopt a number of policies to reverse a decline in the endangered birds ,including establishing new habitat for the birds----  


这里的including可以看作是方式状语


总之,多亏了les MM



我同意LES的说法,一般出现including时,including 是作为介词而不是分词,但其引导的部分一般来说都是做状语的,这点没有异议。


作者: tweib    时间: 2004-8-8 02:10

呵呵,才修改好自己上一贴,就看到了有人回复


请看看我修改后的贴,including是修饰policies,而不能做句子主语scientists的任何形式状语了


作者: gmat700+    时间: 2004-8-8 02:26
以下是引用tweib在2004-8-8 2:10:00的发言:

呵呵,才修改好自己上一贴,就看到了有人回复


请看看我修改后的贴,including是修饰policies,而不能做句子主语scientists的任何形式状语了



Agree!


"including"这里只能是用来补充说明policies的,虽然也算状语,但却不能充当句子主语和谓语动词的状语。


作者: cranberry    时间: 2004-9-11 21:30
跟上一个问题,比如是这样一个句子:goverment dicided to adopt the former polices,including ......。这个句子中的including是状语还是定语呢?
作者: cranberry    时间: 2004-9-12 00:55
跟上一个问题,比如是这样一个句子:goverment dicided to adopt the former polices,including ......。这个句子中的including是状语还是定语呢?
作者: horsefish    时间: 2004-9-12 02:38

引用个例子


GIGI-6-41 (GWD) answer:E


The greatest road system built in the Americas prior to the arrival of Christopher Columbus was the Incan highway, which, over 2,500 miles long and extending from northern Ecuador through Peru to Southern Chile.




  • Columbus was the Incan highway, which, over 2,500 miles long and extending

  • Columbus was the Incan highway, over 2,500 miles in length, and extended

  • Columbus, the Incan highway, which was over 2,500 miles in length and extended

  • Columbus, the Incan highway, being over 2,500 miles in length, was extended

  • Columbus, the Incan highway was over 2,500 miles long, extending

  • 系表结构的句子, 分词结构做状语, 这个看得清楚


    作者: ellen1223    时间: 2004-11-2 00:46
    以下是引用horsefish在2004-9-12 2:38:00的发言:

    引用个例子


    GIGI-6-41 (GWD) answer:E


    The greatest road system built in the Americas prior to the arrival of Christopher Columbus was the Incan highway, which, over 2,500 miles long and extending from northern Ecuador through Peru to Southern Chile.







    1. Columbus was the Incan highway, which, over 2,500 miles long and extending

    2. Columbus was the Incan highway, over 2,500 miles in length, and extended

    3. Columbus, the Incan highway, which was over 2,500 miles in length and extended

    4. Columbus, the Incan highway, being over 2,500 miles in length, was extended

    5. Columbus, the Incan highway was over 2,500 miles long, extending

    系表结构的句子, 分词结构做状语, 这个看得清楚


    那这道题B错在哪里?谢谢。


    作者: timeaway    时间: 2004-11-2 00:48

    protecting引导一个状语表结果,表示是前面整句话对后面造成的影响,protect的动作发出者是前面整句。


    作者: calla    时间: 2005-3-30 13:17
    以下是引用timeaway在2004-11-2 0:48:00的发言:

    protecting引导一个状语表结果,表示是前面整句话对后面造成的影响,protect的动作发出者是前面整句。


    我也是这么理解的


    作者: titatita    时间: 2006-1-6 08:25

    Choice C is best because the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did.

    根据og的解释,只说分词protecting引导了一个词组来解释shields干了什么.我觉得les这里把protecting引导的短语解释为原因状语太牵强了.

    感觉不是状语,是定语.以前brave mba gg解释的很清楚了.

    下面贴出以前讨论中的话

    Q og39,49,229 -ing at the end of the sentence ,after a comma

    49. The cameras of the Voyager II spacecraft detected six small, previously unseen moons circling Uranus, which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting the distant planet
    which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting
    doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known to orbit
    which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known in orbit around
    doubling to twelve the number of satellites now known as orbiting
    which doubles to twelve the number of satellites now known that orbit

    OG229,
    .... the technique degrades major works of art, likening it to putting lipstick on a Greek status.

    Answer 39、the participle protecting begins a phrase that explains what the shields did,动作的发起者就是shields,句子主语。

    T39 感觉是定语,修饰句子主语
    T49 感觉是结果状语

    49、这里modify the preceding clause,现在分词在句尾,可以做定语、伴随状语、目的状语(结果状语)。我认为这里做结果状语。比较灵活,要根据句子意思来判断。

    现在分词做定语时,其一定有修饰对象,一般情况下,在句尾做定语,其逻辑主语是句子主语,但是还是要根据句子意思来判断;
    做状语时,如果是表示伴随动作,一般情况下是修饰主句的动作谓语;如果做伴随结果,是修饰整个句子。
    所以,以上主要都是通过句子意思来判断的。

    animal-hide shields with wooden frames protecting warriors against enemy arrows and spears were essential items of military equipment
    只不过分词短语放在主谓之间太累赘,所以放在了句尾。还记得TOEFL里有很多这样的分词做定语的形式吗?
    如果分词修饰的是名词,一定是做定语;如果修饰的是谓语动词,通常是伴随动作状语;如果修饰的整个句子,通常是结果状语,例如第二题。

    这要根据句子意思,如果修饰的是句子主语或者就近的名词,就是定语;如果修饰的是动词或者是句子,则是状语。

    只是说现分在句尾优先做状语,但是不是不能做定语,OG39不是表示伴随的含义。而OG229我认为是状语,感觉应该是修饰整个句子,因为说的是“把....比做”,是将的technique degrades major works of art的这个过程。
    不过,这个差异我认为并不是特别影响做题。所以更凸现句子意思的重要性。

    现在分词修饰,没有逗号的规则,即其在即可做定语也可做状语,要根据句子意思。OG39的PROTECTING我认为就是定语,修饰主语,只不过如果放在主语后太长,显得罗嗦,所以置后了。做状语从意思上觉得很难讲通。不过此题句子成分并不影响做题。


    [此贴子已经被作者于2006-1-6 8:25:53编辑过]

    作者: yiga    时间: 2006-1-6 12:25
    以下是引用ellen1223在2004-11-2 0:46:00的发言:


    那这道题B错在哪里?谢谢。


    同问。


    作者: yiga    时间: 2006-1-6 12:31
    以下是引用horsefish在2004-9-12 2:38:00的发言:

    引用个例子


    GIGI-6-41 (GWD) answer:E


    The greatest road system built in the Americas prior to the arrival of Christopher Columbus was the Incan highway, which, over 2,500 miles long and extending from northern Ecuador through Peru to Southern Chile.






    1. Columbus was the Incan highway, which, over 2,500 miles long and extending

    2. Columbus was the Incan highway, over 2,500 miles in length, and extended

    3. Columbus, the Incan highway, which was over 2,500 miles in length and extended

    4. Columbus, the Incan highway, being over 2,500 miles in length, was extended

    5. Columbus, the Incan highway was over 2,500 miles long, extending

    系表结构的句子, 分词结构做状语, 这个看得清楚


    b错在哪里?


    作者: wycg    时间: 2006-1-6 13:06
    顶!
    作者: crazyyeah    时间: 2008-10-25 18:49
    这是一个强帖,看到了很多很精彩的观点
    作者: deuxteer    时间: 2009-7-15 14:55

    我认为protecting是做定语,修饰equipment

    参见OG10th 191

    191. Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.
                

    (A) provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry
                

    (B) provide free cashing of government checks, and creating basic savings accounts carrying
                

    (C) to provide free cashing of government checks, and creating basic savings accounts that carry
                

    (D) to provide free cashing of government checks,
                creating basic savings accounts to carry

    (E) to provide free cashing of government checks,
                and to create basic savings accounts that carry
                

    Choice E, the best answer, is the only choice that maintains parallelism with the infinitive phrases to disclose..., [to] provide..., and to create.... (平行)In A and B, the second element lacks the infinitive marker to. Choice C loses parallelism by shifting to a participial phrase, creating....Choice D loses parallelism by dropping the conjunction and;
            
    (不平行)a modification problem results because the participial phrase creating... attaches to the noun checks, thus distorting the meaning of the last element of the parallel construction.
                






    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3