ChaseDream

标题: LSAT-12-4-10【seabirds】 [打印本页]

作者: pocahontas    时间: 2004-8-7 17:24
标题: LSAT-12-4-10【seabirds】

10. Lydia: Each year, thousands of seabirds are injured when they become entangled in equipment owned by fishing companies. Therefore, the fishing companies should assume responsibility for funding veterinary treatment for the injured birds.



Jonathan: Your feelings for the birds are admirable. Your proposal, however, should not be adopted because treatment of the most seriously injured birds would inhumanely prolong the lives of animals no longer able to live in the wild, as all wildlife should.




Jonathan uses which one of the following techniques in his response to Lydia?



(A) He directs a personal attack against her rather than addressing the argument she advances.



(B) He suggests that her proposal is based on self-interest rather than on real sympathy for the injured birds.



(C) He questions the appropriateness of interfering with wildlife in any way, even if the goal of the interference is to help.



(D) He attempts to discredit her proposal by discussing its implications for only those birds that it serves least well.



(E) He evades discussion of her proposal by raising the issue of whether her feelings about the birds are justified.




通过排除法很容易做出来是D,但是我还没看懂D的意思。:"> its implications for only those birds that it serves least well.

是什么意思呀?





作者: lawyer_1    时间: 2004-8-7 20:03
He attempts to discredit her proposal( by discussing its implications for only those birds) that it serves least well.            that后面部分作proposal的定语
作者: pocahontas    时间: 2004-8-7 20:59
标题: LSAT-12-4-10【seabirds】
收到!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3