标题: 关于OG12 133中protecting的问题，还没有人问过这个。 [打印本页] 作者: EMMALIULIU 时间: 2011-12-19 21:48 标题: 关于OG12 133中protecting的问题，还没有人问过这个。 133. Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles. (A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect (B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting √ (C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect (D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting (E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting OG解释说不能用to require是因为让人误以为laws的目的是在捕虾网上安装turtle-excluder devices，但实际上是为了protect turtles。那如果将is protecting改成to protect，是不是更好？作者: EMMALIULIU 时间: 2011-12-19 22:11
up作者: EMMALIULIU 时间: 2011-12-19 22:47
没有人答哦。。。再ding！作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-12-20 01:06
is protecting强调了当前说本句的时刻该compliance已经在保护海龟了。 （上礼拜他们）说他们对某某法规的遵守在这个礼拜已经开始保护海龟了。作者: EMMALIULIU 时间: 2011-12-20 23:54
版主真好，第二次了，没人回答我的时侯都帮我解答！