ChaseDream

标题: [讨论]OG 124 [打印本页]

作者: summersmile    时间: 2004-8-5 07:50
标题: [讨论]OG 124

124. During Roosevelt’s years in office Black Americans began voting for Democrats rather than Republicans in national elections, but Black support for Democrats at the state and local levels developed only after when civil rights legislation was supported by Harry Truman.


(A) developed only after when civil rights legislation was supported by Harry Truman


(B) developed only after when Harry Truman supported civil rights legislation


(C) developed only after Harry Truman’s support of civil rights legislation


(D) develops only at the time after the supporting of civil rights legislation by Harry TrumanC


(E) developed only after there being Harry Truman’s support of civil rights legislation


1In choices A and B, after when is unidiomatic: one word or the other can be used to establish temporal sequence, but not both together.(连用大错特错)2In D, the phrase at the time after is awkward and temporally confusing; 3moreover, the present tense develops is used incorrectly to describe action completed in the past. 4In E, the construction after there being... support is ungrammatical. Choice C, grammatical and idiomatic, is the best answer.








关于错误选项,ets解释很清楚,但我对正确选项C不是很清楚:after 可以是conj.\prep.\adv.\adj.


1、这里after 是prep?


2、after中文是哪个解释呢?


after 做prep可以翻译为...之后,也可以译为:由于; 因为; 考虑到;


例如:
After the impertinent way you acted, who could like you?


由于你那鲁莽的做法, 谁还能喜欢你呢?-------摘自金山词霸


作者: rt316    时间: 2004-8-6 02:04

1 - prep.

2 - 在...以后


作者: summersmile    时间: 2004-8-6 04:39

谢谢stoneren!


作者: autumn_leaves    时间: 2005-3-5 23:47

我在想关于B选项after when为什么不能连用?

为什么不能把after看作连词,when 看作副词,语法上也是讲的通的.

我记得ETS有as when连用的用法,如as when she was a child..这里为什么是不对的,谢谢!


作者: jerjer    时间: 2005-3-6 22:59

after-------behind x


when--------at x


Don't you think it to be logical, do you?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-3-6 23:24:49编辑过]

作者: siebel    时间: 2005-3-7 11:24
after = when, in this sentence.
作者: autumn_leaves    时间: 2005-3-12 19:20

请问,我改变一下选项:

developed only after Harry Truman supported civil rights legislation

是不是要比

developed only after Harry Truman’s support of civil rights legislation

好?

谢谢


作者: ford424    时间: 2005-3-13 14:38
从句意和逻辑上面区别不大, 考试应该不会让对比这两个选项, 个人认为都可以, 没有那个更好.




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3