11. The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when he sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.
(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing which指代abolition错
(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed which指代abolition错/which重复
(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed（E）表面上好，逻辑错
(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
In choice A, was is incorrect; the verb must be were to agree with times. （主谓不一致） Also, which becomes the subject of a compound verb that lacks parallelism: was determined…and differing. （？？？） In choice B, was is again incorrect, and the use of two which clauses is awkward. （笨拙） In choice C, which were determined…and differing is another faulty compound verb. （？？？） Choice D presents a false compound: determined is an adjective modifying local times and differed is the simple past tense of to differ. （不平行） Because they serve different grammatical functions, these words cannot be treated as parallel elements joined by and. Choice E is best: without which, determined and differing function not as verb elements but as parallel modifiers of local times. （平行） This question is very difficult.
which becomes the subject of a compound verb that lacks parallelism: was determined…and differing. （？？？） In choice C, which were determined…and differing is another faulty compound verb. （？？？）
这两句OG为何说它们不平行 which were determined ...and (were ) differing 是平行的啊
虽然不如E简洁
谢谢
were determined里的were表达的是被动，were differing里表达的是过去进行时，两个were的功能不一样，所以不能省略。
就算补出了were, 由于时态语态都不一致，所以也是不对称的。
were determined里的were表达的是被动，were differing里表达的是过去进行时，两个were的功能不一样，所以不能省略。
就算补出了were, 由于时态语态都不一致，所以也是不对称的。
rhod, 这个能详细地讲讲吗 没明白啊 平行并不要求在从句主被动完全一致 因为这是根据句意判断的
谢谢
were differing from city to city为何不对
因为主句用的是一般过去时 所以这里只能用过去时态
表示过去正在进行的状态 所以只能用过去进行时
stoneren兄已经帮我说了。
我的意思就是"此were非那were".
11. The growth of the railroads led to the abolition of local times, which was determined by when he sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing from city to city, and to the establishment of regional times.
(A) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing which指代abolition错
(B) which was determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and which differed which指代abolition错/which重复
(C) which were determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
(D) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differed（E）表面上好，逻辑错
(E) determined by when the sun reached the observer’s meridian and differing
In choice A, was is incorrect; the verb must be were to agree with times. （主谓不一致） Also, which becomes the subject of a compound verb that lacks parallelism: was determined…and differing. （？？？） In choice B, was is again incorrect, and the use of two which clauses is awkward. （笨拙） In choice C, which were determined…and differing is another faulty compound verb. （？？？） Choice D presents a false compound: determined is an adjective modifying local times and differed is the simple past tense of to differ. （不平行） Because they serve different grammatical functions, these words cannot be treated as parallel elements joined by and. Choice E is best: without which, determined and differing function not as verb elements but as parallel modifiers of local times. （平行） This question is very difficult.
which becomes the subject of a compound verb that lacks parallelism: was determined…and differing. （？？？） In choice C, which were determined…and differing is another faulty compound verb. （？？？）
这两句OG为何说它们不平行 which were determined ...and (were ) differing 是平行的啊
虽然不如E简洁
谢谢
我覺得此處be determined和 differ變成在修飾前一句主詞The growth, 因為參照大全624 及大全626, 可以發現626 中 不可用depending,而必須要用who depend來修飾historians, 那為何此句的differring 可用來修飾times?
謝謝!
我覺得此處be determined和 differ變成在修飾前一句主詞The growth, 因為參照大全624 及大全626, 可以發現626 中 不可用depending,而必須要用who depend來修飾historians, 那為何此句的differring 可用來修飾times?
謝謝!
实际上，determined 前面有逗号，所以修饰会有歧义，修饰times或者修饰主句主语growth, 这个问题怎么没有人提起？？
为什么没有人顶一顶这个帖子 NN们路过不要错过啊
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |