ChaseDream

标题: 关于主语从句的引导词问题 [打印本页]

作者: echochen    时间: 2004-8-4 15:44
标题: 关于主语从句的引导词问题

请问主语从句是否不能省略引导词.如: That the supply of oil is finite has become an economicand political consideration of the first magnitude for all modern industrial nations.


that不能省略


作者: LISAYUAN750616    时间: 2004-8-5 09:25
不能省否则两个谓语动词了。
作者: echochen    时间: 2004-8-5 11:20
是否任何情况下都不能省......
作者: leeon    时间: 2004-8-5 11:38
可以省略的,一般是在定语从句中做宾语的时候省略(that/which)。
作者: rhod    时间: 2004-8-5 11:44

可以省略的,一般是在定语从句中做宾语的时候省略(that/which)。

leeon, echo mm说的是主语从句的引导词,不是定语从句的引导词。

是否任何情况下都不能省......

我没看见过有哪种情况可以省。


作者: leeon    时间: 2004-8-5 11:53
以下是引用rhod在2004-8-5 11:44:00的发言:



我没看见过有哪种情况可以省。


sorry,我原意是想通过此贴列出所有的(that,which)省略结构,我只能凭记忆记得这一种情况了,今天手头没带语法书。哪位大侠帮忙全部列举一下。


作者: rhod    时间: 2004-8-5 12:30

参考marie mm的帖子:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=48649



omitting that.  You can omit that in a relative clause when the subject of the clause is different from the word or phrase the clause refers to. Thus, you can say either the book that I was reading or the book I was reading. You can also omit that when it introduces a subordinate clause: I think we should try again. You should not omit that, however, when the subordinate clause begins with an adverbial phrase or anything other than the subject: She said that under no circumstances would she allow us to skip the meeting. The book argues that eventually the housing supply will increase. This last sentence would be ambiguous if that were omitted, since the adverb eventually could then be construed as modifying either argues or will increase.


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-5 12:31:10编辑过]

作者: leeon    时间: 2004-8-5 12:49
thx
作者: bigpotato82    时间: 2007-7-18 03:46
ding
作者: ccalways    时间: 2023-9-14 22:37
rhod 发表于 2004-8-5 12:30
参考marie mm的帖子:http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=48649 omitting that.  ...

顶!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3