题目如下：
251. The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. .
(A) extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
(B) extinction; its numbers are now five times more than
(C) extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were
(D) extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had
(E) extinction, now with numbers five times greater than
不太明白E错在哪？OG的解释是Choices D and E wrongly use a phrase introduced by now with to modify The gyrfalcon. In both choices, the phrase confusingly seems to parallel with extinction; a new clause with a present tense verb is needed to state what the gyrfalcon's numbers are now.
看选项E是觉得不太对，就是不知道到底错在哪里？？看了OG的解释还是没弄清楚
牛牛们都说作题光凭感觉是不行的，我牢记心上。所以还麻烦哪位牛牛给偶讲讲E这个到底错在哪？不胜感觉啊！！
E表面上与前面 with extinction平行了 错
因为从句意要求的是 说明gyrfalcon的数量 要另起一个独立的句子
恩恩。。。paopao大侠说的太棒了，
我明白了！！！非常感谢paopao大侠的说！！！！！
E表面上与前面 with extinction平行了 错
因为从句意要求的是 说明gyrfalcon的数量 要另起一个独立的句子
请问NN，这时一条规则吗？
Choices D and E wrongly use a phrase introduced by now with to modify The gyrfalcon. In both choices, the phrase confusingly seems to parallel with extinction; a new clause with a present tense verb is needed to state what the gyrfalcon's numbers are now.
这话解释的真ETS!
可以用這樣的方式判斷媽?
因為when 必須要有兩個從句組成
S+V+when S+V 所以用with 不行
不曉得這樣算不算一個判斷標準
請NN回答
E)extinction, now with numbers five times greater than
可不可以 treat "now with number five times greater than" as 独立主各结构? Is it correct as far as the grammar and logic are concerned, if for now the parallelism error with "with extinction" is ignored?
Still confused.
Please, could someone give a hand here?
E错就错在那个now上，仔细想想就明白了。with XXXX表示对主句主语的伴随，应该是同级的。但是now和主句是两个时间的概念
E)extinction, now with numbers five times greater than
可不可以 treat "now with number five times greater than" as 独立主各结构? Is it correct as far as the grammar and logic are concerned, if for now the parallelism error with "with extinction" is ignored?
同问，查了前面所有的帖子也没发现该问题的具体解释。
为什么不能把E看成独立主格呢？而且怎么会认为两个with短语平行呢，要真平行的话，好歹得有个and之类的词来表达吧？
请NN解惑
即便可以把e看成独立主格，e也有可能和前面with平行，不是有歧义了吗，所以不好。还有with...than后面还跟了一个从句when...,我觉得还是分成两个单句比较清楚
望指正
1.我选择E. 以为能回避开its numbers这种看上去心慌慌的表达方式. 结果两次都栽了.
现在回过头来看, 虽然its numbers是有些奇怪,但是在their缺乏指代的情况下,its numbers就很可能是正确的选项,没有必要再进一步回避了,否则单复数这个考点就白考了. NN看这种考试思路可行么?
2.有人摘录OG10对E.选项的解释,说逗号后面的with numbers与前面的with extinction会形成平行结构.所以不正确,对此我是这样理解的,请NN指正:
鉴于a close brush with(该词组通常带有敌意或警告性的接触)extinction 意思是"一度面临绝种"的意思,那么后半句(a close brush) now with numbers five times greater than的意思就成了"一度曾面临数量是1970年代5倍的局面".-------数量大幅度增长显然是好事,不应该含有敌意或警告的意思,所以一定不能用now with...,而必须另起炉灶,构建完全独立的一套句子结构. 所以A.对.
55555,
我在做这题时,根本不知道a brush with的意思, 必定,肯定,一定会追求平行对称, 所以也必定,肯定,一定会错. 只能感叹一句:母语TMD就是有优势呀!
现在OG11中的解释说:E. Comma usage introduces a confusing phrase seeming to modify extinction. 新的解释到是让我糊涂了,with...结构什么时候可以修饰前面的宾语了? 不是一向都优先修饰主语么,怎么现在挑错都如此自然,和谐?
这日子没法过了. S.O.S
说明gyrfalcon的数量 要另起一个独立的句子。
这句话很有道理，可是还是不知道E哪里错
另外，dormousedzc 你的精神太可嘉了...我服死你了。
另外，dormousedzc 你的精神太可嘉了...我服死你了。
呵呵...一路走下来...
关于１２楼说滴：＂E错就错在那个now上，仔细想想就明白了。with XXXX表示对主句主语的伴随，应该是同级的。但是now和主句是两个时间的概念＂
斑竹认为呢？ 和now有关么？
还有独立主格和主句主语需要同级么？？？
谢谢斑竹
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |