ChaseDream

标题: 大全-III-15 [打印本页]

作者: LES    时间: 2004-7-31 11:28
标题: 大全-III-15

15.   It is true that unionized women earn, on average, more than a third more than nonunionized women do. But the unionized women work in industries where wages happen to be high, their nonunionized counterparts in these industries earn about as much as they do. Therefore unionization does not raise women’s wages.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?


(A) Besides wage increases, unions bargain for benefits such as medical insurance and workplace safety.
(B) The most highly paid women are in executive positions, which are not unionized.
(C) Wages in many industries vary from one part of the country to another, regardless of whether workers are unionized or not.
(D) Nonunionized women in an industry often receive income increases as a result of increases won by unions representing women who work for other employers in the same industry.D
(E) The unionization of women who work for one employer in a given industry frequently prompts the unionization of women who work for other employers in the same industry.


问,A选项为什么不对?谢谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-10-21 21:48:29编辑过]

作者: cranberry    时间: 2004-7-31 11:48
A确实说了联盟的一个好处,但确实没有对文章中的结论有任何的削弱作用,就算是争来了房子和汽车,但只要对工资没有影响,这个结论就是成立的。我们做削弱题目时,经常犯的错误就是没有牢牢地盯住文章的结论。
作者: LES    时间: 2004-7-31 12:05
Thank you, cranberry! I got it!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3