ChaseDream

标题: og12-23引发的关于【分词】在【并列句】句尾的问题,跪求指导 [打印本页]

作者: zoexixi    时间: 2011-12-8 13:45
标题: og12-23引发的关于【分词】在【并列句】句尾的问题,跪求指导
In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is lined with lead around the perimeter, thereby improving stability in flight and resulting in longer throws.

(A)In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is

(B)According to a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition was concentrated in a metal center, but now it is

(C)Once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, the discus used in track competition is now

(D)The discus used in track competition, once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, but now

(E)The discus used in track competition was once designed having its weight concentrated in a metal center and now

答案为C,OG的各项解释我也明白,我的问题是,假设有这样一个选项

(F) The discus used in track competition was once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, but now it is

我设置这个选项的【目的】是想说如果存在一个答案,【不存在】语法错误,但是它是一个【并列句】,所以请大家忽略此选项中可能有的语法错误

如果这样一个【无语法错误的并列句】成立,那么句末的【improving从句】,该如何看待它修饰的对象?
逻辑上它是修饰第二个分句,但是它会不会造成修饰不清楚的问题,比如它形式上可以修饰第二个分句么?可以修饰整个并列句么?又能不能跳跃修饰第一个分句?如果以上问题成立,那么这一点修饰混乱,又能不能成为判定【F】选项错误的TIP?

综合起来说,就是【SVO, and SVO,- ing从句】这种结构是否存在?   如果存在,【-ing从句】的成分优先考虑修饰哪个?其次是哪个?

跪求大牛指导,谢谢!

作者: zoexixi    时间: 2011-12-8 20:24
在线求~~~!!!
作者: HarrisZheng    时间: 2011-12-8 20:48
既然是并列句,那就是两个完整的句子,分词状语在哪个句子里就修饰哪个。所以位置决定修饰
作者: zoexixi    时间: 2011-12-8 20:59
既然是并列句,那就是两个完整的句子,分词状语在哪个句子里就修饰哪个。所以位置决定修饰
-- by 会员 HarrisZheng (2011/12/8 20:48:07)


请问LS,您的意思我是不是可以理解为,【SVO, and SVO, ing从句】这种结构是存在的,并且它是修饰【and后面】的那个从句,并且不存在修饰整个句子这种歧义,是么?
作者: HarrisZheng    时间: 2011-12-8 21:21
我觉得可以存在,但一般还是改成复合句更好看吧。一堆简单句并列显得没水平,大量从句嵌套是GRE或是GMAT比较prefer的
作者: zoexixi    时间: 2011-12-8 21:29
我觉得可以存在,但一般还是改成复合句更好看吧。一堆简单句并列显得没水平,大量从句嵌套是GRE或是GMAT比较prefer的
-- by 会员 HarrisZheng (2011/12/8 21:21:24)



谢谢您的回答,从OG的解释来看,我一直觉得GMAT的首选是并列句呢, 我想再问下,如果(F)选项存在,也是成立的是么?有没有关于【SVO, and SVO, ing从句】这种结构存在的例子,我想再体会下,万分感谢您了!!!
作者: HarrisZheng    时间: 2011-12-8 21:57
首先, 你要搞清楚一个概念. 复合句比简单句并列简洁
几个不能算是原则的参照吧:
复合句比简单句堆叠简洁  如 I have a dog, and he likes to go out for a walk.  就不如I have a dog that likes to go out for a walk.

短语比从句简洁 如 My dog  likes to go out for a walk when he finishes dinner. 不如,分词结构 Finishing dinner, my dog  likes to go out for a walk. 或者 独立主格 Dinner finished,my dog  likes to go out for a walk


F 选项语法没错 但没有C选项好
作者: zoexixi    时间: 2011-12-8 22:06
谢谢哦,非常感谢您的回答!!!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3