ChaseDream

标题: lsat-3-1-16 [打印本页]

作者: n9a5x7 时间: 2004-7-27 10:47
标题: lsat-3-1-16

LSAT-3-I-16.
The current proposal to give college students a broader choice in planning their own courses of study should be abandoned. The students who are supporting the proposal will never be satisfied, no matter what requirements are established. Some of these students have reached their third year without declaring a major. One first-year student has failed to complete four required courses. Several others have indicated a serious indifference to grades and intellectual achievement.

A flaw in the argument is that it does which one of the following?

(A) avoids the issue by focusing on supporters of the proposal
(B) argues circularly by assuming the conclusion is true in stating th e premises.
(C) fails to define the critical term "satisfied"
(D) distorts the proposal advocated by opponents
(E) users the term "student" equivocally

那位nn给翻译解释一下各个选项，especially A 选项

作者: robertchu 时间: 2004-7-27 13:00
标题: lsat-3-1-16
A: 不讨论建议的内容，而是攻击提建议的人

Usually it's not a good idea to translate CR choices into Chinese. You should try to think in English.

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)