标题: 求问逻辑题——feifei61 [打印本页] 作者: nicolemama 时间: 2011-11-15 09:41 标题: 求问逻辑题——feifei61 61. Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.
Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?
A.Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems. B.Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August. C.Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August. D.Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were. E.Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August. 为什么选C? 先拜谢！！！ 作者: 法语小公主 时间: 2011-11-15 14:12
首先，你要明白题目问的是以下哪个假设削弱结论，underlying在这里是削弱的意思，不是潜在的意思，所以C选项削弱了原因，因此导致结论不成立。作者: nicolemama 时间: 2011-11-16 09:17
非常感谢作者: ljwsophie12 时间: 2011-11-17 20:32
不对吧 我怎么觉得问的是assumption呢作者: lxt7 时间: 2012-7-2 10:12
我真的不知道为什么有那么多的逻辑做题方法，其实我们每个人都是有逻辑的啊，只要你逻辑正常就好了，什么取非，什么他因，都是瞎扯，请问你们做中文逻辑题说这么多么？你只要自己读懂题，一切OK。请你仔细的看题，题目问的是Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?也就是问这篇文章的逻辑。这篇文章的逻辑是什么请问？就是说，去年八月以来的机械事故报告规则严格了，这个又导致了报告的频率上升了50%。题目问这篇文章是基于什么假设呢？就是事实其实没有那么高的机械事故率，这恰恰说明了是由于rules 而accounts for 报告率的上升。取你吗的非啊