ChaseDream

标题: 请教关于OG149,164一问,谢谢 [打印本页]

作者: coolluoxi    时间: 2004-7-23 23:49
标题: 请教关于OG149,164一问,谢谢


149. Last year, land values in most parts of the pinelands rose almost so fast. and in some parts even faster than what they did outside the pinelands.


(A)  so fast, and in some parts even faster than what they did


(B)  so fast, and in some parts even faster than, those


(C)  as fast, and in some parts even faster than, those


(D)  as fast as, and in some parts even faster than, those


(E)   as fast as, and in some parts even faster than what they did


问:比较对象应一致,且状态也应一致,为什么those后面不加did?


如I am taller than you are!


164. The commission proposed that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year. is obtained through a local bond issue.


(A)  that funding for the park's development, which could be open to the public early next year, is


(B)  that funding for development of the park, which could be open to the public early next year, be


(C)  funding for the development of the park, perhaps open to the public early next year, to be


(D)  funds for the park's development, perhaps open to the public early next year, be


(E)   development funding for the park, which could be open to the public early next year, is to be


Choice B is best. Choice A attaches the relative clause which could be open ... to the noun development, when, in fact, it is the park that could be open. ·········

Choice D incorrectly uses perhaps open to the public ... to modify development; the phrase should modify park. Choice E, which seriously distorts meaning, says that the commission proposed development funding and that such funding could be open to the public ....


问:which 从句的先行词到底应该是谁?OG对E和A的分析截然不同!请教!


作者: rt316    时间: 2004-7-24 01:07

149这种表达是个习惯问题,当比较的主语相同时,往往用代词that/those补出,这个时候一般不需补出动词,而当比较的主语不同时才需补出动词;

164请MM翻翻以前狗狗(vincent0330)发的帖子,大概在第9页有ETS新的解释。


作者: coolluoxi    时间: 2004-7-27 01:14

谢谢哥哥的说,

164请MM翻翻以前狗狗(vincent0330)发的帖子,大概在第9页有ETS新的解释。

请问该怎么去翻啊,谢谢啊


作者: vincent0330    时间: 2004-7-27 06:53

石兄, 你是不是把OG164=vincent0330这种逻辑关系建立起来啊.....呵呵

OG164(含ETS官方回复):

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&star=9&replyid=459510&id=53201&skin=0&page=1


作者: tdyg    时间: 2006-2-23 00:54
149是属于主谓结构下的主语比较,没有宾语干扰,所以无须补出谓语动词,不会引起歧义。
作者: 当当84    时间: 2006-6-19 23:01

这题,A and E omit the comma needed after than,这里为什么要加逗号,不加会产生歧义吗?


作者: ana9    时间: 2006-10-19 10:34
remember:
 名词,+同位语 /插入语,+动词, 两边的逗号必不可少.    OG35 is the same

作者: 期待蔚蓝    时间: 2006-11-3 14:21
以下是引用ana9在2006-10-19 10:34:00的发言:
remember:
 名词,+同位语 /插入语,+动词, 两边的逗号必不可少.    OG35 is the same

Last year, land values in most parts of the pinelands rose almost  as fast as, and in some parts even faster than,
                    
those
outside the pinelands.

荧光笔部分是做插入语是吗?


作者: denne    时间: 2006-12-21 01:04

我半夜看贴正值萎靡困顿之际, 突然看到楼上的头衔, 哈哈哈, 大笑三声, 倦意全无.

楼上的, 偶居然在cd找到组织了, 真素不容易啊

偶要不要把头衔或者签名档也改下捏, 嘿嘿

 

版主大人容我水一贴, 不好意思啊


作者: denne    时间: 2006-12-21 01:05
以下是引用期待蔚蓝在2006-11-3 14:21:00的发言:

Last year, land values in most parts of the pinelands rose almost  as fast as, and in some parts even faster than,
     
those
outside the pinelands.

荧光笔部分是做插入语是吗?

是插入部分, 做题时完全可以遮住不看






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3