ChaseDream

标题: OG12-36 遐想-自编一题，大家帮忙看看，也娱乐一下 [打印本页]

作者: by4css 时间: 2011-10-30 12:31
标题: OG12-36 遐想-自编一题，大家帮忙看看，也娱乐一下
XXX研究院著名叫兽近日咆哮称在行程超过1000公里的时，飞机相撞的风险为每月0.00000001次，而与飞机同速的高铁的风险为每月1次。因此如果要在保持不增加旅途时间的前提下尽可能减少出行风险，乘客应该多乘坐飞机。

以下哪个最可能是是铁道部发言人对于该论述的反驳：

A) 高铁相撞后，党中央国务院高度重视；出事地点群众空前团结，有利于出事地点的精神文明建设和保持社会和谐。
B）该叫兽经常喜欢放屁，因为他超级喜欢吃五香豆。
C) 飞机相撞不可能有幸存者，高铁相撞至少能活一般人。
D) 飞机相撞坠落到地面的之后形成的撞击坑的形状比高铁相撞后的坑更圆润，更符合国家标准。
E）中国人民是不怕死的，真撞了就可以从此离开大陆去一个比米国更牛叉的地方了。

其实主要是想问问C 算不算WEAKEN呢？因为在原题中C很明显是strengthen，但是如果是offshore ops 更严重，是不是就是正确选项呢？
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

原题：

Offshore oil-drilling operations entail an unavoidable
risk of an oil spill, but importing oil on tankers
presently entails an even greater such risk per
barrel of oil. Therefore, if we are to reduce the risk of
an oil spill without curtailing our use of oil, we must
invest more in offshore operations and import less oil
on tankers.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens
the argument above?
(A) Tankers can easily be redesigned so that their
use entails less risk of an oil spill.
(B) Oil spills caused by tankers have generally been
more serious than those caused by offshore
operations.
(C) The impact of offshore operations on the
environment can be controlled by careful
management.
(D) Offshore operations usually damage the ocean
floor, but tankers rarely cause such damage.
(E) Importing oil on tankers is currently less
expensive than drilling for it offshore.

作者: liran95 时间: 2012-2-20 21:17

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)