ChaseDream

标题: OG12 07 关于修饰的小问题(已解决~谢谢大家的帮助~~) [打印本页]

作者: 布布布布布丁 时间: 2011-10-27 10:58
标题: OG12 07 关于修饰的小问题(已解决~谢谢大家的帮助~~)
7. As its sales of computer products have surpassed
those of measuring instruments, the company has
become increasingly willing to compete for the mass
market sales they would in the past have conceded
to rivals.
(A) they would in the past have conceded to rivals
(B) they would have conceded previously to their
rivals
(C) that in the past would have been conceded
previously to rivals
(D) it previously would have conceded to rivals in
the past
(E) it would in the past have conceded to rivals

OG关于D选项的解释：
D Th e placement of in the past makes it unclear
whether it is supposed to modify rivals or
would have conceded; if the latter, then it is
redundant.

答案没有问题，通过其他语法点很清楚地能找到best choiceE
但是D选项说的in the past到底应该修饰什么呢？

作者: 布布布布布丁 时间: 2011-10-31 10:48
up up up ~~

作者: sanlingjie 时间: 2011-10-31 15:54
这题in the past 本来是应该修饰would have conceded，但是这里修饰不清，有修饰rivals的歧义，并且，如果in the past在这里修饰would have conceded，那么它就和前面的previously重复了。因为previously也是修饰would have conceded，且意思和in the past一样。

作者: 糊涂的小黑 时间: 2011-10-31 20:25
LS说的很对

作者: 布布布布布丁 时间: 2011-10-31 22:29

这题in the past 本来是应该修饰would have conceded，但是这里修饰不清，有修饰rivals的歧义，并且，如果in the past在这里修饰would have conceded，那么它就和前面的previously重复了。因为previously也是修饰would have conceded，且意思和in the past一样。

-- by 会员 sanlingjie (2011/10/31 15:54:11)

喔喔~~~！原来是修饰动词哦。。。

作者: 布布布布布丁 时间: 2011-10-31 22:29

-- by 会员 sanlingjie (2011/10/31 15:54:11)

喔喔~~~！原来是修饰动词哦。。。

-- by 会员布布布布布丁 (2011/10/31 22:29:05)

谢谢~~~~~

作者: 午夜精灵Ying 时间: 2013-10-15 22:22
"it previously would have conceded to rivals inthe past" in the past 是时间状语，只能修饰动词不能修饰名词的啊。迷惑

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)