ChaseDream

标题: feifei 58题不明白求助~~~ [打印本页]

作者: leipw    时间: 2011-10-26 15:14
标题: feifei 58题不明白求助~~~
Some people say that the scarcity of food is a function of the finite limits of the earth’s resources, coupled with a relentless rate of population growth. This analysis fails to recognize, however, that much of the world’s agricultural resources are used to feed livestock instead of people. In the United States
, for example, almost one-half of the agricultural acreage is devoted to crops fed to livestock. A steer reduces twenty-one pounds of inexpensive grain to one pound of expensive meat. Thus, the scarcity of food is not merely a function of limited resources and population growth.



Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument to be properly drawn?


A.People prefer eating meat to eating grain.
B.Meat is twenty-one times more expensive than grain.
C.The limits of the earth’s agricultural resources are not finite.
D.More than one-half of the agricultural acreage in the United States
is devoted to drops fed to humans. E.Growing crops for human consumption on the acreage currently devoted to crops for livestock will yield more food for more people.


E is the best answer. 喂养牲畜消耗的粮食为人们创造更多的食物。(题目内容是:有观点认为食物缺乏是因为土地资源有限而人口数量却不断增多。但作者认为该观点忽视了农产品中有相当大一部分是用来喂家畜的。在美国几乎有一半土地的粮食是为了养家畜。1
肉要用去21廉价的谷物。因此,食物缺乏不仅是因为土地资源有限而人口数量却不断增多。)根据题目要求,我们只须反驳养家畜对粮食紧缺造成的影响。选项A中即使人们爱吃肉只会引起更多的粮食消耗,不能反驳作者; B并不能充分改变人们的取向;C强词夺理;D重复事实。


为什么不是选A呢?看不懂解释~~求助~~
作者: me_sheep    时间: 2011-10-26 20:21
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-508969-1-1.html?postid=14639593&searchmode=TopicContent&searchtext=feed%20livestock%20instead这里已经讨论的很详细了~~看看吧~~然后如果以后不太明白的题可以复制题中关键字比如这道题“feed livestock”之类的, 然后去搜索论坛里面 选择“主题内容”就好了~ 然后你就能看到花花花好多帖子。。这样就可以省去很多等待的时间了。。。


LZ加油~




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3