标题: 59-2-15 LR问题请教 [打印本页] 作者: tigerpeng031 时间: 2011-10-24 06:01 标题: 59-2-15 LR问题请教 15, Bowers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flourish in a condition of anarchy, the absence of government. Some of these theorists have even produced interesting arguments to support that position. One writer, for example, contends that anarchy is laissez-faire capitalism taken to its logical extreme. But these theorists' views ignore the fundamental principle of social philosophy-that an acceptable social philosophy must promote peace and order. Any social philosophy that countenances chaos, i.e., anarchy, accordingly deserves no further attention. The reasoning in Bowers's argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that A, the meaning of a key term shifts illicitly during the course of the argument B, the argument fails to show that laissez-faire capitalism deserves to be rejected as a social philosophy C, the truth or falsity of a view is not determined by the number of people who accept it as true D, the argument presumes, without providing justification, that any peaceful society will flourish E, it is unreasonable to reject a view merely because it can be described as extreme.
答案是A。这题我实在不明白，哪个词语 语义变换了。。。。 求教～ 谢谢作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-10-24 06:39
The definition of anarchy from the absence of government to social philosophy that countenances chaos.作者: chasingd2012 时间: 2011-10-24 15:21
A?作者: tigerpeng031 时间: 2011-10-25 02:47
对哦，，好像是definition of anarchy 从 absence of government 到 自由capitalism了。 。 谢谢你～