Dear SDCAR,
As the "NO" part, I have one question:
For example: No one who is good at basketball can play tennis well.
I knew it equals to "One who is good at basketball cannot play tennis well."
My question is : does the example also equals to "One who is not good at basketball can play tennis well"
-- by 会员 innerwarrior
Correct: One who can play tennis well is not good at basketball.
Wrong: One who is not good at basketball can play tennis well.
Which part of lawyer's explanation you do not understand or have questions?
P.S. I am not a 版主 here. Only a member.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/10/19 22:51:18)
For the Advertisement question:
This is a must-be-true question, one of the easiest for CR because the answer HAS been stated in the stimulus. You job is just to find it!
C is totally true because it is the necessary assumption for the argument.
Necessary assumption question is a type of must-be-true question. In this case, which is a must be true question, the must-be-true part is the assumption made by the author - continuing advances in product quality are possible - to reach his main conclusion: The company can meet its goal.
根据原文的逻辑链:
if advance in the quality of manufactured , then raises customer expectations. (every=if)
MegaCorp's goal is to meet/extend customer expectations=>if meet/extend customer expectations, then meet MegaCorp's goal
Your second analysis is wrong. This is a simple statement of "MegaCorp's goal = meet/extend customer expectations." If anything, this is an if and only if statement, not if-then statement ONLY.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/10/19 23:03:28)