作者: byebyelove 时间: 2004-7-16 20:55
Gun powders and spices are believed to have been introduced to Europe by Cchinese in the 15th century.
I think the author want to express " have been introduced " is earlier than" are believed "
作者: WONDERLAND2004 时间: 2004-7-16 21:38
Thanks for your help.
Actually, I choosed the right answer which is A by ruling out the other choices with some obvious flaws.
However, I am quite puzzled by the expression "as balanced" here. I do not know why "AS" is used in this scentence in this way.
作者: seanxyz 时间: 2004-7-28 22:53
up
i also have the same problem
作者: juan 时间: 2004-7-28 23:18
我认为balanced后面承前省略了economy. 其实原句是view the economy as balanced economy between ..and ...
作者: philikittist 时间: 2004-8-6 17:16
大家对这道题的答案没有意见了么？我觉得view sth as+adj是常考的错误呀。我选D。请大家解惑。
作者: blackhorse 时间: 2004-8-6 17:36
大家对这道题的答案没有意见了么？我觉得view sth as+adj是常考的错误呀。我选D。请大家解惑。
D是一个明显的错误选项，错误的地方不止一处，首先and前后不平行，其次who指代不清。
作者: philikittist 时间: 2004-8-6 17:48
D是一个明显的错误选项，错误的地方不止一处，首先and前后不平行，其次who指代不清。
谢谢blackhorse！我认为and后面的that of 是省略的，没有平行的问题；who就是指policy makers，没有指代问题。请再看看！
作者: philikittist 时间: 2004-8-7 00:13
upup
作者: rt316 时间: 2004-8-7 00:40
我认为and后面的that of 是省略的，没有平行的问题；who就是指policy makers，没有指代问题。请再看看！
D - Reserve, who now view the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation, will be
即便如你所说，that of被省略，但是无法避免我们在读句子时第一感觉是将that of和low inflation作为平行对象，所以，至少省略that of的表达是模糊的；D的错误还在于view ... to的结构没有view ... as结构更idiomatic。
view ... as 中的as是介词，view the economy as balanced可以理解为view the economy as balanced economy的省略；相关的作介词的as还经常出现在act as actor等结构中。
作者: philikittist 时间: 2004-8-7 01:40
that of 的问题我也觉得很别扭，但做题的时候我首先就把view as排除了,我都没注意that of的问题。看来以后不能太武断。想想我给that of找的理由的却牵强。
view sth as+noun, view sth to be +adj, consider好像就是这个用法，不过consider noun1 noun2 和consider noun to be adj，这个和act as actor不一样，actor是名词，自然用不着to be。如果说balanced可以看成名词的省略形式，那as和to be的混用就不是错误了。本来想在og里搜个例子,发现没有，看来可能是我错了。
还有就是for the foreseeable future，好像都是和将来时连用。
总之偶还是不太明白，觉得SC的最大问题不是看不出错，而是把对的也看成错的。
谢谢stoneren！
作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-8-11 00:01
我跟楼主有同样的疑问。首先我看到A的时候觉得view...as balanced是有问题的，但是看完所有选项之后发现，其它选项错的更多。所以最后选了A。但是对这个view...as balanced一直耿耿于怀。哪位能再给讲讲啊？理解为省略economy好象也有问题：如果可以这么理解的话，那应该所有的do sth. as adj. 都可以理解为do sth. as adj. (sth.), 那as 带adj. 也就再也不是个错误了。
至于D，我觉得除了between...and..后的结构不平行以外，这个that就没有指代对象啊？指代economy的话逻辑上讲不通。所以D肯定不对。
作者: caterpillar 时间: 2004-8-11 00:13
刚从大全里查到一个例句，看来这个用法是可以的。
8. A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
作者: rings 时间: 2004-10-8 21:27
顶一下,想问问.
viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,
help me out ,谢谢
作者: wlt 时间: 2004-10-13 09:59
大家对这道题的答案没有意见了么？我觉得view sth as+adj是常考的错误呀。我选D。请大家解惑。
OG 147:
Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than an emotional bond based on romantic love.
(A) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than
(B) As did other seventeenth-century colonists, Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement rather than viewing it as
(C) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement, like other seventeenth-century colonists, rather than viewing it as
(D) Marriage to Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, was viewed as a property arrangement rather than（E）
(E) Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, viewed marriage as a property arrangement rather than
In E, the best choice, a modifying phrase begun by like immediately follows the name it modifies, Samuel Sewall. E also uses the idiomatic construction viewed marriage as.... Choice A inserts an adverbial modifier, as other... colonists, without the necessary did. It also uses the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage like.... Both B and C use the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage to be.... C incorrectly places the adjective phrase like other... colonists after the word arrangement, which it cannot logically modify. D offers a confusing and awkward passive construction marriage to Samuel Sewall... was viewed....
作者: MarsOcean 时间: 2004-10-19 00:10
UP.
想问一下14楼一样的问题：“viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,”
PS. 大家好象都能直接引别人的话，然后在上面改。。。？怎么弄的
？谢谢
作者: camcam 时间: 2004-12-4 09:43
看到AS头就晕。
作者: aiaidi 时间: 2004-12-4 19:52
看到AS头就晕。
看到AS就狂喜：加10分！
作者: jerryyang 时间: 2005-1-1 22:47
再顶一下,想问问.
viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,
我就是看到这个才排除A，B的
作者: pp_honey 时间: 2005-1-13 17:09
再顶一下,想问问.
viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,
我就是看到这个才排除A，B的
欧也是， 正在总结GWD 的SC,但是这题让我费解，觉得在这里用分词结构会产生歧义viewing 的逻辑主语是模糊的。大家继续讨论。。。。
作者: anyname 时间: 2005-3-29 15:54
再顶一下,想问问.
viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,
我就是看到这个才排除A，B的
不会。因为viewing...是夹在从句中，完全属于从句的private property。就像在你自己箱子里的私房钱一样，在你自己的scope内，别人不会随便染指。
作者: ring_cheng 时间: 2005-3-29 16:36
又遇上anyname了，真巧：）
刚刚看到你对于GWD1-2回复了一个帖子，还没有细看，有空再给你回贴吧。BTW，这个例子应该也可以表明定语具有跳跃修饰作用吧（但不是随意跳跃）：）
作者: anyname 时间: 2005-3-30 10:42
又遇上anyname了，真巧：）
刚刚看到你对于GWD1-2回复了一个帖子，还没有细看，有空再给你回贴吧。BTW，这个例子应该也可以表明定语具有跳跃修饰作用吧（但不是随意跳跃）：）
呵呵，我从来没有说过定语从句不可以跳跃修饰。我只是说，不能用逻辑常理来推出某个跳跃修饰有无歧义。歧义总是相对的，绝对无歧义的句子很少很少。有歧义的没什么大不了的，只有比别的选项好就行。
另外这个句子的最终答案没有跳跃定从吧- Viewing...是状语吧？
作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-5-20 21:16
刚从大全里查到一个例句，看来这个用法是可以的。
8. A majority of the international journalists surveyed view nuclear power stations as unsafe at present but that they will, or could, be made sufficiently safe in the future.
view as+N, 似乎Longman里面也只解释到这个程度, 难道真的是省略了后面的名词吗?
请教了.
作者: ethyl 时间: 2005-5-22 02:03
B：view sth. to be 确实不如view sth as 好；that of 无指代；and are结构混乱，算awkward吧
C：sentence fragment；who引导的限制性定语从句可能会改变句子意思，distortion
D：view … to be；that of 无指代；will be改变时态
E：which改变原意；view …to be；is错
非常好！
作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-5-22 20:41
view as+N, 似乎Longman里面也只解释到这个程度, 难道真的是省略了后面的名词吗?
请教了.
自己顶一下! 感谢先!
作者: melodyji 时间: 2005-6-12 12:59
OG 147:
Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than an emotional bond based on romantic love.
(A) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage, as other seventeenth-century colonists, like a property arrangement rather than
(B) As did other seventeenth-century colonists, Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement rather than viewing it as
(C) Samuel Sewall viewed marriage to be a property arrangement, like other seventeenth-century colonists, rather than viewing it as
(D) Marriage to Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, was viewed as a property arrangement rather than（E）
(E) Samuel Sewall, like other seventeenth-century colonists, viewed marriage as a property arrangement rather than
In E, the best choice, a modifying phrase begun by like immediately follows the name it modifies, Samuel Sewall. E also uses the idiomatic construction viewed marriage as.... Choice A inserts an adverbial modifier, as other... colonists, without the necessary did. It also uses the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage like.... Both B and C use the unidiomatic construction viewed marriage to be.... C incorrectly places the adjective phrase like other... colonists after the word arrangement, which it cannot logically modify. D offers a confusing and awkward passive construction marriage to Samuel Sewall... was viewed....
作者: Avantasia 时间: 2005-6-12 13:09
楼上的例子还是View as + N啊.
我24楼的问题是为什么可以存在View as + adj., 是省略吗?
作者: zenithy 时间: 2005-6-28 23:26
view...as...结构：
as后面可以跟名词，动名词，形容词，介词，甚至过去分词，OG中都有例句（不一定在语法部分），我总结语法的时候都看到过
作者: foreinter 时间: 2005-8-23 15:28
对view as 接形容词实在不理解，另外D选项从句中用will 将来时态也是一个错误吗？
作者: ESeraph 时间: 2005-9-2 20:54
"view ... as" could be follwed by an adj.
"will be" in D may be right, but we lack sufficient evidence to say so.
作者: 丑得老婆哭 时间: 2005-9-10 16:52
3、S,doing/done,V 分词作定语修饰主语（前后一对逗号隔开，相当于定语从句）
注意：如果出现: “名词,doing,名词”，则会有分词前后的修饰歧义，如179DE，245E
作者: Dannie 时间: 2005-9-23 14:13
这里的分词结构viewing如果放在that之后或者整个that从句的后面，就会产生典型的歧义，而放在从句主谓之间的话就基本没有歧义的问题了
作者: foreinter 时间: 2005-9-29 11:07
"view ... as" could be follwed by an adj.
"will be" in D may be right, but we lack sufficient evidence to say so.
能否举个例子关于view as 加形容词的，
我总觉得will be certain to 意思重复，请NN指教。
作者: weichenli 时间: 2005-10-6 16:34
我覺得D 好像不是重複的感覺, 而是意思改變了! A 那些 experts are 怎樣..
D 好像是變成那些 experts 將來要怎樣..
foreinter 你覺得呢?
還有 view...as 的例子我雖然舉不出來..但我覺得是可行的..
作者: lizhi7984 时间: 2005-11-1 05:49
我也想继续问一下前面提到的一个问题
believe that从句是不是一定用一般现在时态
作者: lizhi7984 时间: 2005-11-2 06:22
ding .................
作者: zhoujian 时间: 2005-12-14 17:59
我觉得A选项并非是一个view sth as +adj的结构
而是进行了省略
原句应该是
Reserve, now viewing the economy as (economy) balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
balanced在这里是分词短语修饰省略的economy,也就是说是看作是始终在适度增长和低通货膨胀中保持平衡的经济。
所以A在语法上是正确的，因此答案也是A
作者: adelineyao 时间: 2005-12-14 23:31
view ... as
作者: 入画 时间: 2006-2-11 21:23
我觉得A选项并非是一个view sth as +adj的结构
而是进行了省略
原句应该是
Reserve, now viewing the economy as (economy) balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
balanced在这里是分词短语修饰省略的economy,也就是说是看作是始终在适度增长和低通货膨胀中保持平衡的经济。
所以A在语法上是正确的，因此答案也是A
AGREE
作者: cdsteven517 时间: 2006-3-30 12:33
AS 后面省略了 ECONOMY
作者: jinni 时间: 2006-3-31 10:41
这道题目我还有一个疑问。
A选项中的now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation的插入成分，在这里难道不是典型的夹心饼干的形式么？
即可以理解为定语修饰从句的主语policy makers，又可以理解为状语修饰从句的谓语动词，难道因为从逻辑上理解这个插入成分只有修饰从句主语才合理，所以就认为不存在夹心饼干的怀疑了么？
郁闷，请指教。
GWD-24-Q36
The Industrial Revolution, making it possible to mass-produce manufactured goods, was marked by their use of new machines, new energy sources, and new basic materials.
A. making it possible to mass-produce manufactured goods, was marked by their use of
B. making possible the mass production of manufactured goods, marked by the use of
C. which made it possible that manufactured goods were mass-produced, was marked by their using
D. which made possible the mass-production of manufactured goods, was marked by the use of
E. which made the mass production of manufactured goods possible and was marked by using
如这道题目，当时不选择A，B的原因就是夹心修饰的问题。
作者: vironica_ee 时间: 2006-4-10 13:27
D's "will be" is wrong,too. This should be a thing that happens now. not in the future.
作者: amber0919 时间: 2006-5-7 18:30
这道题目我还有一个疑问。
A选项中的now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation的插入成分，在这里难道不是典型的夹心饼干的形式么？
即可以理解为定语修饰从句的主语policy makers，又可以理解为状语修饰从句的谓语动词，难道因为从逻辑上理解这个插入成分只有修饰从句主语才合理，所以就认为不存在夹心饼干的怀疑了么？
郁闷，请指教。
GWD-24-Q36
The Industrial Revolution, making it possible to mass-produce manufactured goods, was marked by their use of new machines, new energy sources, and new basic materials.
A. making it possible to mass-produce manufactured goods, was marked by their use of
B. making possible the mass production of manufactured goods, marked by the use of
C. which made it possible that manufactured goods were mass-produced, was marked by their using
D. which made possible the mass-production of manufactured goods, was marked by the use of
E. which made the mass production of manufactured goods possible and was marked by using
如这道题目，当时不选择A，B的原因就是夹心修饰的问题。
这里不存在夹心的问题.因为这里的分词是放在主谓之间的. 只可能往前修饰名词.不能往后修饰动词。.
你举的那个例子: A错在代词没直待. B错在没有谓语.
作者: nettrinity 时间: 2006-5-7 18:57
My choice is D...
作者: zhqkai 时间: 2006-8-29 09:27
各位NN,
Q8:
Many financial experts believe that policy makers at the Federal Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future.
- Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
- Reserve, now viewing the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation and are
- Reserve who, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
- Reserve, who now view the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation, will be
Reserve, which now views the economy to be balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, is
我想问个基本问题: viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation的逻辑主语是谁?是financial expert还是policy makers ? 这种夹心修饰有什么规律吗? 有没有放在这, 确跟的是句子的主语financial expert搭配的呢? 谢谢!
作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-10 07:23
Q8:
Many financial experts believe that policy makers at the Federal Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future.
- Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
- Reserve, now viewing the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation and are
- Reserve who, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
- Reserve, who now view the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation, will be
- Reserve, which now views the economy to be balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, is
1 请问C为什么错，是因为了who 的出现，使得viewing的逻辑主语是experts??
2 D的will be 错是因为什么呢，是因为believe that 还是因为certain 呢，觉得用将来时是错的，但是又找不出明确的原因。
3 我总觉得will be certain to 意思重复，将要和必然要是不是重复呢，这是不是也是D的一个错误呢？？
4 believe that从句是不是一定用一般现在时态？？？？
作者: madben 时间: 2006-9-10 10:50
1. C is wrong because are is used as the verb of who-clause and thus that-clause doesn't have a verb to complete the sentence.
2. I don't think will be is wrong. What makes D incorrect is view ... to be ... is unidiomatic.
3,4. I don't thik so.
作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-10 12:17
1. C is wrong because are is used as the verb of who-clause and thus that-clause doesn't have a verb to complete the sentence.
2. I don't think will be is wrong. What makes D incorrect is view ... to be ... is unidiomatic.
3,4. I don't thik so.
1. C is wrong because are is used as the verb of who-clause and thus that-clause doesn't have a verb to complete the sentence.
再回过去看，确实如此，我对句子结构掌握的还是不好。
2. I don't think will be is wrong. What makes D incorrect is view ... to be ... is unidiomatic.
存疑，再等大家讨论。
3,4. I don't thik so.
好，就这么定了。
谢谢。作者: 清清小蚂蚁 时间: 2006-9-10 16:53
继续问
D的will be 是否错？还是说这里用are 用will be 都可以呢？
因为什么呢？
作者: sendme 时间: 2006-9-10 18:54
i prefer "are".
...,are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future.
that means the rates don't change from now to the foreseeable future.
if the original sentence is like "are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged in the foreseeable future" ---"will be" is better.
作者: ecochem 时间: 2006-9-26 10:52
D选项的will be有点问题
now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation修饰policy makers，表示他们现在的状态，那么谓语很自然就是are...，
如果用will be，翻译成中文就会变成“现在将经济看作...的政策制订者，将来会如何如何做...", 明显不合乎逻辑
作者: liuyang1984 时间: 2006-10-6 15:37
新东方老师总结过
view/perceive/depict/think of /regard....sth ..as
我笔记记的
嘿嘿，想起来那语法老师长的好帅哦
作者: 晴天小狗 时间: 2006-10-25 11:46
查了字典 似乎没有view to be的用法
to think about something or someone in a particular way
It's an issue that can be viewed from several perspectives.The local people viewed newcomers with suspicion.formal
to look at something, especially because it is beautiful or you are interested in it
Thousands of tourists come to view the gardens every year.formal
to watch a television programme, film etc
an opportunity to view the film before it goes on general release作者: 高宝拉 时间: 2007-2-7 11:13
明白了明白了！！！！
作者: leonnuaa 时间: 2007-6-8 14:00
后面的for the foreseeable future,不要求用将来时吗?我一看就选了D了~~~~~~~~
作者: нандин 时间: 2007-8-16 22:49
最简单的就Ａ的结构最工整
作者: nemojia 时间: 2007-10-28 01:04
BDE ：to be 表示主观色彩```
A: Many financial experts believe that policy makers at the Federal Reserve who are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future. 就是简化就是这样啊```不是一个完整的句子阿
作者: phenomena 时间: 2008-5-25 00:13
感觉view。。。as的用法实际上就是as的用法
作者: lijiahui0422 时间: 2008-11-3 11:32
不会。因为viewing...是夹在从句中，完全属于从句的private property。就像在你自己箱子里的私房钱一样，在你自己的scope内，别人不会随便染指。
没错
作者: Ryan0222 时间: 2008-11-5 21:53
再顶一下,想问问.
viewing会不会使产生是Many financial experts 的动作而不是policy makers 的歧义呢?因为view是ing,动作的发出者是主句的主语啊,
我就是看到这个才排除A，B的
这个句子是宾语从句吧~~所以不可能是主句主语发出的动作啊
作者: baiyiyao 时间: 2008-11-14 19:18
o 我也是今天才看到这个讨论
感觉好多题前人都讨论过了 怎么最近几年反而讨论的少了呢
是因为新题少么？
作者: jjyune 时间: 2009-2-16 22:14
同感！！！现在语法版的讨论一点都不热烈啊
作者: deuxteer 时间: 2009-7-6 20:49
1. C is wrong because are is used as the verb of who-clause and thus that-clause doesn't have a verb to complete the sentence.
2. I don't think will be is wrong. What makes D incorrect is view ... to be ... is unidiomatic.
3,4. I don't thik so.
终于有人回答了关于C的疑问，谢谢啊
看来对句子结构的把握非常重要啊
作者: jean1280 时间: 2009-8-9 00:34
c里面are不就是verb嘛？为什么还缺verb呢？
作者: mars_cheung 时间: 2009-9-22 00:44
C. Reserve who, (now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, )are bla... bla... bla...
C 选项里面 who,...,are... 就是一个定语从句，are 已经是定从的谓语了，所以 believe that 的宾从没了宾语，句子结构不完整。
作者: buffonjuventus 时间: 2010-10-4 21:44
对哦，句子结构真的很重要。
作者: wangwanwang 时间: 2014-10-29 10:19
mars_cheung 发表于 2009-9-22 00:44
C. Reserve who, (now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation ...
五年前的了，谢谢
作者: Be_Better 时间: 2015-11-22 16:26
请问一下：for the foreseeable future 和 in the foreseeable furture有什么不同呢？还有我觉得， now viewing the economy as..., 是状语修饰 are almost certain to... 大家怎么看呢？
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |