Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted.Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lake’s waters have become cleaner.Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again.However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed.Therefore, provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless. The argument depends on assuming which of the following?
A. Apart from development related to the pipeline, there will be no new industrial development around the lake that will create renewed pollution in its waters.
B. There is no reason to believe that the leak-preventing technology would be ineffective when installed in the pipeline in Lake Konfa . C. The bottom of the lake does not contain toxic remnants of earlier pollution that will be stirred into the water by pipeline construction.
D. Damage to the lake’s fish populations would be the only harm that a leak of oil from the pipeline would cause.
E. The species of fish that are present in Lake Konfa now are the same as those that were in the lake before it was affected by pollution.
答案选C。我想问问D哪里错。作者: squall2284 时间: 2011-10-10 08:10
d的意思是石油泄漏的危害只会导致鱼的数量下降……其实也就是泄漏会导致鱼的数量下降，我感觉只是把保证不泄漏就不会危害到鱼，这个结论的改写。作者: wdyoooo 时间: 2011-10-10 13:24
原文的重点是关注the construction of the oli pipline 是否会让污染revive，oil leak不是唯一加重污染的原因，况且文中已经说明oil leak可以通过装配一项技术得到有效防止。所以D选项中关于oil leak 的讨论就显得与论题无关了，因为oil leak已经在原文中被说明并不可能发生。