ChaseDream

标题: 987 两道so as to和so that区别求助。。。 [打印本页]

作者: yeah529    时间: 2011-10-7 19:42
标题: 987 两道so as to和so that区别求助。。。
1.       Climatic shifts are sogradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuations inthe weather.
(A) so gradual asto be indistinguishable
(B) so gradualthey can be indistinguishable
(C) so gradualthat they are unable to be distinguished
(D) gradual enoughnot to be distinguishableA
(E) gradual enoughso that one cannot distinguish them


这道答案是A。。


1.       Congress is debating a billrequiring certain employers provide workers with unpaid leave so as to carefor sick or newborn children.
(A) provideworkers with unpaid leave so as to
(B) to provideworkers with unpaid leave so as to
(C) provideworkers with unpaid leave in order that they
(D) to provideworkers with unpaid leave so that they canD
(E) provideworkers with unpaid leave and
这道答案是D。。。
我就看不明白了。。到底什么时候要加代词呢。第二题,用so as to会有歧义么??求大牛指点
作者: yeah529    时间: 2011-10-7 19:44
貌似发完自己有点醒悟,是不是和主句主语有关系。。第二题如果用so as to的话是不是就变成a bill去care for sick呢???继续等待大牛指教
作者: 半阙    时间: 2011-10-7 20:01
so as to后面动作的主语必须是主句主语,而so that 无此要求

第一题C选项“are unable to be distinguished”很awkward,be able to be一般看到就可以直接扔了~~
作者: yeah529    时间: 2011-10-7 20:12
so as to后面动作的主语必须是主句主语,而so that 无此要求

第一题C选项“are unable to be distinguished”很awkward,be able to be一般看到就可以直接扔了~~
-- by 会员 半阙 (2011/10/7 20:01:13)



谢拉谢啦~
作者: 可卡其蓝    时间: 2011-11-8 19:42
我有个问题!那第二题中的D选项的they会不会有指代歧义呢?they可以指代employers啊??而不是worker啊?
作者: vinbobo    时间: 2011-11-8 19:49
我有个问题!那第二题中的D选项的they会不会有指代歧义呢?they可以指代employers啊??而不是worker啊?
-- by 会员 可卡其蓝 (2011/11/8 19:42:42)



代词的模糊性是相对的,同时一般指代离得最近的名词实体
因此是workers

同时,so as to事实上可以不是与主语主语发生关系
分析这个结构,so as to,核心是to,to一般是作为状语在这个结构中,因此是修饰前面的动作clause,因此出现逻辑主语的问题
因此这题在这个层面来说,模糊是因为前面有三个动作,我们不知道到底是哪个动作的状语,因此不知道是哪个逻辑主语




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3