ChaseDream

标题: prep2-210 关于伴随状语 [打印本页]

作者: yunshishow 时间: 2011-10-2 14:58
标题: prep2-210 关于伴随状语
Emily Dickinson’sletters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years beforeSusan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in1886, outnumbering
B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years beforeSusan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in1886, outnumber
C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’smarriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering
D. Dickinson, which werewritten over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’sbrother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering (E)
E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years beforeSusan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in1886, outnumber
此题答案E。A中为什么不能把outnumbering看成是were written这个动作的伴随状语？因为were written是被动所以不行么？

作者: jefferson911 时间: 2011-10-2 16:57
原来已经讨论过这题了。

“现在分词放句尾用逗号隔开做状语时有两种功能：表伴随动作（逻辑主语为句子主语）、表伴随结果（无逻辑主语）。
outnumber和were writing不是同一时间发生，语法上不能作为伴随动作。
outnumbering和前面的were written并没有直接因果关系，逻辑上不能作为伴随结果。"

作者: 清飞扬 时间: 2011-10-2 17:12
this sort of modifier（ING型独主的从句结构形式） should actually satisfy TWO requirements:
1) it should apply most nearly to the subject of the preceding clause (as you've said); and, even more importantly,
2) it should have one of the following RELATIONSHIPS to that clause:
* immediate consequence
* simultaneous, but lower-priority, action
here, this modifier doesn't have either of these 2 relationships to the main clause, so it's used inappropriately.

作者: yunshishow 时间: 2011-10-2 19:16
其实我觉得were written和outnumbering也可以算得上是同时发生。所以我一直认为这也算是动作的伴随。

作者: superbat28 时间: 2011-10-3 00:02
这两个动作不能同时发生的啊~考虑下逻辑~记住这个东西叫SC= Sentence correction. 并不完全是Grammar correction，所以很多题在复习的时候，要深究下语义逻辑。

were written是描述【写信】这个动作，前半句话是说【这些信在一个时间段写的】
而outnumber它暗含着一种【结果】的意味，相当于有一种感觉，像是【后人数她之前写过的信，发现这些信的数目超过了其他的信】

也就是说，两个动作并不在一个层面上。不可能说【一边写】然后一边【outnumber】
肯定是，先是【写信】，然后后人点数后发现它【outnumber】~

作者: yunshishow 时间: 2011-10-3 08:11
谢谢楼上几位的解答，完全明白了。

作者: yxyqm 时间: 2011-10-5 18:27

这两个动作不能同时发生的啊~考虑下逻辑~记住这个东西叫SC= Sentence correction. 并不完全是Grammar correction，所以很多题在复习的时候，要深究下语义逻辑。

were written是描述【写信】这个动作，前半句话是说【这些信在一个时间段写的】
而outnumber它暗含着一种【结果】的意味，相当于有一种感觉，像是【后人数她之前写过的信，发现这些信的数目超过了其他的信】

也就是说，两个动作并不在一个层面上。不可能说【一边写】然后一边【outnumber】
肯定是，先是【写信】，然后后人点数后发现它【outnumber】~

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/10/3 0:02:09)

懂了，版主果然威武

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)