标题: 请教GWD-16 逻辑题，到底咋分析，选撒呢？ [打印本页] 作者: susan19910606 时间: 2011-10-1 12:18 标题: 请教GWD-16 逻辑题，到底咋分析，选撒呢？ 3. GWD25-Q3. Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements. Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect. Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members. B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group. 无定论，我支持B,不过A,C都有支持者，汗。作者: tutulee 时间: 2011-10-2 10:44
我选A pat是用现在法官很少做lectures and teaching 来假设潜在的考虑作法官的人也不会做lectures or teachings.