ChaseDream

标题: 求助—OGv补充材料CR—81 [打印本页]

作者: maiaaqw    时间: 2011-9-30 10:44
标题: 求助—OGv补充材料CR—81
这个ad看得我都不知道是支持这个mayor还是反对mayor了。。。
求救

Political Advertisement: Mayor Delmont's critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont's leadership. Yet the fact is thatnot only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but each year since Delmont took office the average pay for the new jobs created has been higher than that year's average pay for jobs citywide. So it stands to reason that throughout Delmont's tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger[c1].

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument in the advertisement?

(A) The unemployment rate in the city is higher today than it was when Mayor Delmont took office.

(8) The average pay for jobs in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.

(C) Each year during Mayor Delmont's tenure, the average pay for jobs that were eliminated has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide.
(D) Most of the jobs eliminated during Mayor Delmont's tenure were in declining industries.

(E)The average pay for jobs in the city is currently lower than it is for jobs in the suburbs

surrounding the city.

正确答案是C
作者: M猫Fishoo    时间: 2013-8-29 17:04
广告是说: 市长D批评那些job lost的抱怨, 然后给出两个列子, 结论是市长D掌政期间工资在稳定的增长

广告是支持市长D的, 这题要weaken结论average paycheck has been getting steadily bigger

A 失业率跟paycheck无关

B D刚开始掌政paycheck在最低点, 说明掌政后高了, support

C 被灭掉的工都是高薪 那平均数自然就减少了  正解

D 被灭掉的工在declining industries. 应该算无关项, 不过也可看作有一点加强结论 反正不是答案

E suburb 无关项(题目问in the city)




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3