标题: OG12——63，weaken题，不适应这种选项，请教 [打印本页] 作者: 万能兜 时间: 2011-9-27 23:26 标题: OG12——63，weaken题，不适应这种选项，请教 63. When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deafand are then asked whether they can hear thehypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try toexplain this result by arguing that the selves ofhypnotized subjects are dissociated into separateparts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociatedfrom the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?
(A) Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?
(B) Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation?
(C) why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D) Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described?
(E) Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects? 作者: manxeon 时间: 2011-9-28 10:29
这道我也很头痛，看解释看半天作者: scottli889 时间: 2011-9-29 12:22
看完OG我是这样理解的，提上说科学家解释被催眠的人被分解为两部分，一部分是deaf的，一部分是来reply的也就是not deaf的。当被问到是否能听见时，回答的这部分是not deaf的，所以他们更应该回答Yes。所以科学家的解释不成立。这个选项很好的削弱了科学家的解释。作者: onlybeata 时间: 2011-9-29 20:51
尽管被实验者回答No 听不见，但真的听不见的人不会知道实验人员问他们什么，因而会说yes? 绝不可能针对问题回答no