ChaseDream

标题: GWD Set 1 T41 [打印本页]
作者: WONDERLAND2004    时间: 2004-7-12 20:58
标题: GWD Set 1 T41

请大家看看这道题。谢谢


Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.




  • as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established

  • as a method of the extraction of minerals well established

  • was a well-established method of mineral extraction

  • was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was

  • had been a method of mineral extraction, well established
    • 作者: rhod    时间: 2004-7-12 21:08

    A. it多余。
    B. but前半句属于sentence fragment.
    D. that was不简洁, extracting mineral 不如名词形式 mineral extraction.
    E. 时态错误，没有必要用过去完成时.

    so the answer is C.

    作者: WONDERLAND2004    时间: 2004-7-12 21:51
    as early as the eighteenth century前面怎么没有介词啊？
    作者: rhod    时间: 2004-7-13 09:38
    as early as eighteenth century是个形容词短语，中心词是early, 不是表示时间的状语，为什么要介词？
    作者: bachordersee    时间: 2004-7-14 23:04

    C 是最好的，在五个选项中。选C

    作者: WONDERLAND2004    时间: 2004-7-15 00:37

    rhod ，


    既然as early as eighteenth century是个形容词短语，那么修饰谁呢？如果是method的后置形容词短语的话，还原成“as early as eighteenth century method”好像不太通顺。继续请教。 谢谢

    作者: sunnyspring    时间: 2004-7-29 16:55
    as early as eighteenth century 做时间状语修饰was
    作者: jojocarter    时间: 2004-9-14 12:30
    本来在A和C之中我也有犹豫，后来一看it明显是多余的，所以答案是C没错。
    作者: hiddragon    时间: 2004-9-17 14:55
    http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&id=58705&star=3#58705
    作者: asicschu    时间: 2004-11-1 16:38
    我懂了!! 謝謝各位!!
    作者: rosebudxiaojie    时间: 2005-9-15 21:54
    A of B that 定从, 不会有歧异吗? 定从到底修饰A还是B啊?
    作者: cold2100    时间: 2006-10-7 20:52

    感觉c和d，与原句意思相差太大了！新东方不是说选项应该尽量符合原文意思吗？

    作者: wanjun    时间: 2007-9-24 14:44

    转贴来自伤心咖啡

    供参考

    (A) (B) as a method...如果as表身分, 修饰Leaching中间隔了一个同位语的确太远, 然本题as a method 是错误选项, 因为
    (A) Leaching, 同位语, as a method…, it was…两个修饰语并列awkward, 且it指leaching, 前面的修饰结构awkward and wordy.
    (B)没有动词, well established 修饰的对象有歧义, 是method, 还是the extraction of minerals

    作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-10-4 23:02
    怎么回事儿怎么回事儿……
    作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-10-21 22:28
    以下是引用rhod在2004-7-12 21:08:00的发言：

    A. it多余。
    B. but前半句属于sentence fragment.
    D. that was不简洁, extracting mineral 不如名词形式 mineral extraction.
    E. 时态错误，没有必要用过去完成时.

    so the answer is C.

    clear and cut!
    作者: Joyce_yan    时间: 2008-1-2 17:18

    UP ~~ 终于弄懂了 。

    哎，废时间啊。。

    作者: latinjazz    时间: 2008-7-26 22:23

    一开始考虑C and D, 后来选D错了

    我也知道D不简洁

    但是C= Leaching was a well-established method of mineral extraction 直接接as early as the eigheenth century怪怪的

    我也说不上来为什么怪怪的于是选D, 原因是D结构我觉得比较正常...

    能为小弟解释一下除了不简洁之外, 为什么不选D的a method that was as early as 18th century吗

    作者: Bonjourwei    时间: 2009-1-11 17:43
    以下是引用rhod在2004-7-12 21:08:00的发言：

    A. it多余。
    B. but前半句属于sentence fragment.
    D. that was不简洁, extracting mineral 不如名词形式 mineral extraction.
    E. 时态错误，没有必要用过去完成时.

    so the answer is C.

    为什么E中没有必要用过去完成时呢？

    因为 as early as 是25年前的之前发生的事情啊~

    作者: ciafica    时间: 2012-4-15 08:58
    一开始考虑C and D, 后来选D错了
    我也知道D不简洁
    但是C= Leaching was a well-established method of mineral extraction 直接接as early as the eigheenth century怪怪的
    我也说不上来为什么怪怪的于是选D, 原因是D结构我觉得比较正常...
    能为小弟解释一下除了不简洁之外, 为什么不选D的a method that was as early as 18th century吗
    -- by 会员 latinjazz (2008/7/26 22:23:00)


    同样中枪选错



    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3