ChaseDream

标题: but后一定要接完整句子吗? [打印本页]

作者: pye34878    时间: 2011-9-19 11:09
标题: but后一定要接完整句子吗?
223.(GWD-23-Q23)After several years of rapid growth, the health care company became one of the largest health care providers in the metropolitan area, while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to doctors and hospitals.

A.while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its payment to

B.while it then proved unable to handle the increase in business and fell months behind in its payment to

C.but then it proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in its paying

D.but then proving unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying(E)

E.but then proved unable to handle the increase in business, falling months behind in paying



题目释义:the company became one of the largest providers, but then proved unable to handle sth., falling months behind in panying

考点:习惯用语(idiom句子结构(grammatical construction

1.动词比动名词简洁: paymentpaying好,developmentdeveloping好。对于没有专门名词形式的动词,再应该用动名词。

2.While在表示转折对比时,有两件events同时发生的含义。

选项分析:A.即便表示转折对比,while也有”at the same time“的含义在里面,与then矛盾,并让句意变成了the health care company expanding and falling是同时发生的,但是实际上应该是先became largest,然后再fellits payment没有问题,只是没有in paying to简洁

B.while的错误同Afall用动名词形式做伴随状语更好,因为fallhandle并不属于同一层次,而是属于unable to handle的结果;its payment没有问题,只是没有in paying to简洁

C.前面的it多余,可以省略(effctiveness)in its paying,使得paying从动词变成了动名词,不简洁,且paying这个动作就是the health care company执行的,所以不用加上itsprep.+one’s+doing往往是不简洁的,要多加留意

D.proving错误,应该直接用prove

E.CorrectProved通常用主动表示被动,but后面省略了it,因为主语相同

补充说明:1. but后面本来是应该加句子的,但是在主语相同的情况下可以省略主语。
以上来自08prep语法笔记


我的问题:
1.but后一定要接完整句子吗?但是查了一下发现but也可以做介词,也就说也可以接宾语名词,或是动名词结构?
2.D的解释说应该直接用prove是因为but只能跟从句,这样的结构是理解为省略了主语it的关系,然后Prove主动表被动吗?
但这样E中的解释就说不通了啊·如果prove主动表被动,那么正确选项E中的Proved又该怎么解释呢?应该理解为被动语态还是一般过去时呢?
3.我能否直接理解but这里为介词而非连词,其后不需接完整句子,然后proved过去分词表被动修饰句子主语the health care company?
求高手解答~
作者: pye34878    时间: 2011-9-19 12:56
顶一个~
作者: 血翼蝙蝠拉么    时间: 2011-10-4 22:37
我的理解是,proved是一般过去时,和became并列。本来貌似应该是be proved to be,但是这种说法比较啰嗦,所以简单写成一个prove,也就是主动表被动。这时prove的用法就等同于一个系动词(也或者他本来就是个系动词),这样两个系动词的并列结构就非常工整了。
作者: hellocrystal    时间: 2011-10-15 09:24
顶一个,求大牛解答
作者: donkid    时间: 2011-10-15 16:47
同意一个。proving貌似打破了并列结构,但是给人以其和后面的giving并列的错觉,一般不注意看搞不好选了。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3