今天做了3题,觉得很诡异,选对了,但都是靠排除法。。。呜呜呜,自己怎么也猜不到答案的。
1:33s
The prices of the same items in SK is 5% higher than in the FB
Since:。。。。。。。。。。。。
Conclusion: the result doesn’t show that shopping in the FB will save money than shopping in the SK
A
是不是这样理解“人们会比较每个相同的商品在不同店的价格,而不是比较总体价格,就是说,如果,A 在FB便宜,就去FB买,A在SK便宜就在SK买,而不会关买ABCDE这么多东西的总体价格。”?????
2:46s
Premise:employees are out of shape will pay more for their health-insurance.
Premise: the company will offer a program of jogging and weight lifting for its employees, and they want those employees who are out of shape will take part in this program.
Conclusion: the company must reduce their health-insurance
Guess: the program can help those employees keep fit.
Choice: C
睡了,睡了,今天又晚了,明天接着写~
加油,争取下次自己能想对方向!!
-- by 会员 bananazoo (2011/9/16 1:19:36)
狐狐第三题我明白了
可是第四题为什么 专家能预测Rift Valley fever会爆发疫苗的销量就会上涨? 它不是会失效吗? 干嘛还用疫苗啊?
是不是只有一秒这一种办法能防止Rift Valley fever呀?
我觉得我已经走向死胡同了...
-- by 会员 corneliaflower (2011/9/18 23:32:35)