标题: 同位语修饰词要紧跟其修饰内容？？ [打印本页] 作者: ykelly123 时间: 2011-9-4 23:24 标题: 同位语修饰词要紧跟其修饰内容？？ prep08 181题 the number of people flying first class on domestic flights rose sharply in 1990, doubling the increase of the previous year.
A. doubling the increase of B. doubling that of the increase in C. double as much as the increase of D. twice as many as the increase in E. twice as many as the increase of
正确句子 the loan company announced it would soon lend money to borrowers with proven records of not paying back their loans on time, a group collectively know as the subprime lending market.
其中a group是同位语修饰前面的borrows with proven records, 这个同位语没有紧跟阿！！！这两题不是互相矛盾吗？？？！！！
知道的冒一下泡阿！！！很是纠结！谢谢了
这两题有没有矛盾？！作者: angelcity 时间: 2011-9-12 22:05
我不确定我的解释是否正确，仅看能否帮助LZ多提供一点思路:In general, noun modifiers touch their nouns, however , there are few exception to the Touch Rule: A mission-critical modifier falls between. This modifier is often an "of " that defines the noun. The less important modifier referts to the noun plus the first modifier. (from manhattan) 我觉得你举的这句:the loan company announced it would soon lend money to borrowers with proven records of not paying back their loans on time, a group collectively know as the subprime lending market.就比较符合这种情况。原则上来说是要touch,但是有些情况that也好，同位语也好，中间也允许有一些critical modifier存在，比如of引导的.我想语法很多规则不能像数学那样有非常明确的情况。LZ根据语境判断一下就好，大的TOUCH原则其实是不违背的。作者: fdrandom 时间: 2011-9-12 22:56
不一样的结构，double是动词，要用ing形式作伴随/结果状语。 a group是名词，和后面的修饰成分一起做独立主格。作者: hdaoho 时间: 2021-10-9 14:58
因为不是the number double,而是the increase double, 所以double不能做the number 的同位语，而应该成为一个动词ing，作状语