标题: 请教一道逻辑题~~~~！！ [打印本页] 作者: selinazhezhe 时间: 2011-8-27 17:25 标题: 请教一道逻辑题~~~~！！ 16.Which of the following, if true, is the most logical completion of the argument below? The tax system of the Republic of Grootland encourages borrowing by granting its taxpayers tax relief for interest paid on loans. The system also discourages saving by taxing any interest earned on savings. Nevertheless, it is clear that Grootland’s tax system does not consistently favor borrowing over saving, for if it did, there would be no______ (A) tax relief in Grootland for those portions of a taxpayer’s income, if any, that are set aside to increase that taxpayer’s total savings (B) tax relief in Grootland for the processing fees that taxpayers pay to lending institutions when obtaining certain kinds of loans (C) tax relief in Grootland for interest that taxpayers are charged on the unpaid balance in credit card accounts
(D) taxes due in Grootland on the cash value of gifts received by taxpayers from banks trying to encourage people to open savings accounts (E) taxes due in Grootland on the amount that a taxpayer has invested in interest-bearing savings accounts 实在是超出我的理解范围。。。。请教大家~！~~作者: 吊坠 时间: 2011-8-27 17:49
我觉得是这样的啊，他说没有鼓励借款超过贷款，就只能是对于纳税人收入的税赋降低，这样，纳税人的收入就高了，所以纳税人就不用借款了，如果把税手的很高，不够花，就都去借款了。作者: xixigongzhu91 时间: 2012-7-21 10:58 标题: 其实是一个paradox 如果是一直支持贷款而抑制存款，那么就不会有针对存款而减少税收的优惠政策了（鼓励存款）