99. Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.
Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day.
In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?
(A) accepts Concetta’s criterion and then adds evidence to Concetta’s case
(B) discredits Concetta’s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence
(C) rejects Concetta’s criterion and then disputes a specific claim
(D) disputes Concetta’s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative creterion
(E) attacks one of Concetta’s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argument
这道题以前的讨论请见以下链接http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&replyID=126183&id=18369&star=1&skin=0
现有两个问题想请教：
1。c 中的dispute 怎样理解，是辩论道的意思（也就是后面是作者的观点），还是反驳的意思（也就是作者反对后面的观点）
2。a specific claim 指什么？是she was ahead of her time in understanding that吗？
我选的是D,总觉得这几个答案说得都差不多，只有一些小词的变化，有没有NN把这类体中的小词的区别说一下，比如说：evidence and fact, premise and mid-conclusion
多谢赐教
1.dispute: to disagree about or question the truth or correctness of (LSAT的题常需精确理解一个词的含义，查英-英字典是个不错的办法）
2。你对a specific claim的理解是对的。
3。C对的原因是：A不同意C采用的标准（怎样才是一个伟大的作家，A不同意C的标准）
A不同意C的一个断言（she was ahead of her time in understanding that，A认为那时大家都已理解）
4。D错的原因是：A只是直接用不同的标准，并没有提供FACT支持他用的标准是对的。
5。B错的原因：并没有GENERALIZE的过程（to form a general opinion after considerating only a small number of the fact)
谢谢楼上的律师xd，我基本搞懂了。
但还有一点不明白，Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchot’s day. 这是一个claim, evidence 还是 fact? 他们之间怎样区别呢？
谢谢
这类题型好像在OG里不多见，最近刚考完的nn们觉得怎样？有吗？我咋觉得特别难，错误率特高，好像有时候比BF还难。郁闷！
,一下子明白好多| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |