标题: 关于OG 逻辑56题 逻辑是不是太简单了？！？！ [打印本页] 作者: fancy3667 时间: 2011-8-14 22:22 标题: 关于OG 逻辑56题 逻辑是不是太简单了？！？！ 第56题说，if there are fewer restrction, there will be more lawyers to advertise, and they will charge less fees. 结论的答案是：if restrictions are removed, there will be more laywers advertise there services. 我认为这个结论只是前面的一部分推论，根本没用上cost的变化。还是我理解有误呢？ 请大侠帮我分析！ 原题为 The fewer restrictions there are on theadvertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise theirservices, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge lessfor that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the stateremoves any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisementsthat do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lowerthan if the state retains its current restrictions. 11. Ifthe statements above are true, which of the following must be true? (A) Somelawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do nothave to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements. (B) More consumers will use legal services if there arefewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services. (C) If therestriction against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements isremoved, more lawyers will advertise their services. (D) If morelawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do notadvertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.（C） (E) If the onlyrestrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply toevery type of advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.作者: fancy3667 时间: 2011-8-15 08:41
自己先顶一下作者: hanshipeng 时间: 2011-8-15 11:10
把题目贴上吧。谁会用工夫自己翻书给你解释啊。作者: fancy3667 时间: 2011-8-15 12:03
我已经贴上了，嘿嘿作者: AlohaDJ 时间: 2011-8-15 15:08
lz可以搜下论坛，之前有不少关于这题的帖子~