ChaseDream

标题: Prep 190 its 的指代 求解释 [打印本页]
作者: guoqi    时间: 2011-8-12 11:55
标题: Prep 190 its 的指代 求解释
The thirteen original British colonies in North America, some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter that set forth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
A.    some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter
B.    some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all of which had written charters
C.    some that formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, all had written charters
D.    with some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all had a written charter      
E.    with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter

笔记中说这里的each 是做colonies 的同位语，那么请问这里的its 指代谁呢？ 前面是复数名词 后面是its  each 虽然做同位语 但是对句子没有影响 也应该是their啊
请大家看看
作者: guoqi    时间: 2011-8-12 12:28
忘了划线部分 不好意思
The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America, some formed as commercialventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter that setforth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
A.    some formed as commercial ventures, others asreligious havens, each had a written charter
B.    some being formed as a commercial venture, othersas religious havens, all of which had written charters
C.    some that formed as commercial ventures, others asreligious havens, all had written charters
D.     with somebeing formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all had awritten charter      (A)
E.    with some formed as commercial ventures, whileothers as religious havens, each had a written charter
作者: guoqi    时间: 2011-8-13 04:24
顶一下 求解释 实在是不明白
作者: guoqi    时间: 2011-8-15 14:19
难道大家都认为这个是个简单的吗？ 求斑竹回答
作者: bitieming    时间: 2011-8-15 14:24
因为有each所以后面才用its啊，或者按照做题的逻辑，因为看到后面的its才知道前面必须用each。its指代13个原英属殖民地中“每一个”
作者: guoqi    时间: 2011-8-15 14:33
因为有each所以后面才用its啊，或者按照做题的逻辑，因为看到后面的its才知道前面必须用each。its指代13个原英属殖民地中“每一个”
-- by 会员 bitieming (2011/8/15 14:24:16)


笔记里是这么解释的，但是each作为同位语 应该是对句子没有影响 充其量只是解释。没有听说过 代词可以跟着同位语而不是跟核心词。
可能是我钻牛角尖了吧....因为确实没有见过
楼上有没有其他的例子， 谢谢了 这帖子都贴上来2天了都没人理啊 感激涕零
作者: AlohaDJ    时间: 2011-8-15 14:39
同意ls.

'复数n.+each'后面的谓语动词不受each影响，要用复数；但逻辑意思却是指‘每一个’，所以要用单数指代代词。
作者: bitieming    时间: 2011-8-15 14:41
The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America, each had a written charter that setforth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
就是去掉中间两个嵌入同位语的句子，可以看到each已经是在主句结构中了，对句子是有影响的吧。each指代内容也非同位语内容，是主句中的conlonies
作者: AlohaDJ    时间: 2011-8-15 14:43
lz可参考07prep1#57注释中这句：
Chinese, the most ancient of living writing systems, consists of tens of thousands of ideographic characters, each character a miniature calligraphic composition inside its own square frame.
作者: guoqi    时间: 2011-8-15 14:51
The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America, each had a written charter that setforth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
就是去掉中间两个嵌入同位语的句子，可以看到each已经是在主句结构中了，对句子是有影响的吧。each指代内容也非同位语内容，是主句中的conlonies
-- by 会员 bitieming (2011/8/15 14:41:54)



这点我有不同的看法，如果不是同位语的话，那么前面的 ”The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America“  放在这里是什么？ 如果是说  a （+句子）， each( 指代A)  + 句子 这种指代是说得通的。而且 根据 aeoluseros 斑竹的解释 中间的嵌入部分也不是同位语，而且独立主格结构。
作者: guoqi    时间: 2011-8-15 14:56
lz可参考07prep1#57注释中这句：
Chinese, the most ancient of living writing systems, consists of tens of thousands of ideographic characters, each character a miniature calligraphic composition inside its own square frame.
-- by 会员 AlohaDJ (2011/8/15 14:43:29)


对啊  这个指代是对的， 因为前面是个分句，很明白的指代。 each 指代chinese, 所以能用its. 因为这里的each是做主语了，its跟着each走。 但是没听说each 做同位结构的时候还能影响代词。这个是我不同意语法笔记的地方。 除非这个题是GMAC这么认为 each 做主语， 然后13个州 做同位解释。但是又跟prep解释上不一样。
作者: bitieming    时间: 2011-8-15 15:03
The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America, each had a written charter that setforth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
就是去掉中间两个嵌入同位语的句子，可以看到each已经是在主句结构中了，对句子是有影响的吧。each指代内容也非同位语内容，是主句中的conlonies
-- by 会员 bitieming (2011/8/15 14:41:54)




这点我有不同的看法，如果不是同位语的话，那么前面的 ”The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America“  放在这里是什么？ 如果是说  a （+句子）， each( 指代A)  + 句子 这种指代是说得通的。而且 根据 aeoluseros 斑竹的解释 中间的嵌入部分也不是同位语，而且独立主格结构。
-- by 会员 guoqi (2011/8/15 14:51:25)


大神说是独立主格结构？额……这两个东西其实很相像啊，但是功能上应该是一样的，都是插入成分在分析时可以去掉。each如果不指代colonies的话，是指代ventures还是havens呢？The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America在这里是主语成分吧
作者: bitieming    时间: 2011-8-15 15:04
突然感觉这个句子each完全可以当副词理解修饰谓语的嘛……
作者: guoqi    时间: 2011-8-15 15:14
The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America, each had a written charter that setforth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.
就是去掉中间两个嵌入同位语的句子，可以看到each已经是在主句结构中了，对句子是有影响的吧。each指代内容也非同位语内容，是主句中的conlonies
-- by 会员 bitieming (2011/8/15 14:41:54)





这点我有不同的看法，如果不是同位语的话，那么前面的 ”The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America“  放在这里是什么？ 如果是说  a （+句子）， each( 指代A)  + 句子 这种指代是说得通的。而且 根据 aeoluseros 斑竹的解释 中间的嵌入部分也不是同位语，而且独立主格结构。
-- by 会员 guoqi (2011/8/15 14:51:25)



大神说是独立主格结构？额……这两个东西其实很相像啊，但是功能上应该是一样的，都是插入成分在分析时可以去掉。each如果不指代colonies的话，是指代ventures还是havens呢？The thirteenoriginal British colonies in North America在这里是主语成分吧
-- by 会员 bitieming (2011/8/15 15:03:33)



对啊 是可以去掉的。这个不影响。 浏览了很多的帖子 很多人说 13个州是主语 我也觉得。但是我现在在想是不是each 是做主语 然后前面的13个州做同位修饰。这样就说的通了。sign....God demn GMAC



欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3