(E)Manystoresinthecentralshoppingdistrictselltypesofmerchandisethatarenotavailableateither SpendLessorColson's. 作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-8-4 22:35
Is this English or junk???作者: cq505836696 时间: 2011-8-5 15:03
I copy it from the electronic document. I'm sorry for that .I don't mention it .I will replace it作者: cq505836696 时间: 2011-8-5 18:37
104. Although the discount stores in Goreville's central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the five years since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened. (B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores. (0 At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had. (D) Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades. (E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's.作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-8-5 20:35
The question has been thoroughly discussed in this forum. You can search Goreville as the key word . . .作者: 鸿逸惩 时间: 2011-8-6 18:29
我也是刚刚上来找这道题的解释，来跟你说说我的想法。 1. 很多折扣店倒闭了是因为竞争不过SpendLess这个折扣店。（Weaken） 2. 自从Colson 开了之后很多店因为竞争不过关闭了（SUPPORT会有新开的店铺） 3。在这些这些关闭了的店的地方新开了店铺。