Can any NN show me the right keys to the below two questions? Thank you.
100. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?
(A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze is inaccurate.
(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved.
(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.
(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.
(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.
101. Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?
(A) an attack on Dr. Ladlow’s character
(B) the application of a general principle
(C) the use of an ambiguous term
(D) the discrediting of facts
(E) the rejectiion of a theoretical explanation
题目是这样的：
Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.
Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist, Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.
I do not hv the given keys on hand. That's why I asked for them.
I also think B and B are best choices.
Z说的事实为L的consistently accurate predictions ，A并没否定这点。故D错。A在最后一句话否定Z。最后一句话说的事一般道理。故选B
我觉得有一点奇怪
D说” Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct”
而在Z提到” On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct”
而所谓的evidence应该是指前一段话” his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze”
因此D确实是把Z所说的话给否定掉且不相信啊!
疑惑中….
Agree with lawyer: B, B.
Q101:
Fact: Dr. Ladlow has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.
Interpretation of fact: (On the basis of this evidence,) Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.
Anson: Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Anson doesn't discredit any fact, but attacked Ladlow's interpretation of the fact.
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |