ChaseDream

标题: GWD16-Q11~困惑困惑~ [打印本页]

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-30 12:37
标题: GWD16-Q11~困惑困惑~
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations.However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools.This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A.The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia’s government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B.During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C. Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia’s government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D.Teachers in Vargonia’s government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E.During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.

答案是B。我选的是C。
迷惑中，求助各位NN啦~

作者: wycg 时间: 2011-7-30 13:41
ACDE 应该都不对. B相对好些. 可以这样理解.
经济好时, 一部分学生去花钱读私立学校,student/teacher的比例变小. 经济不好时,student/teacher的比例加大, 从而要求teacher数量增加. 加强了题干.

作者: maohu 时间: 2011-7-30 17:21
原文只谈了经济危机下教师工作的不减少的问题，没有谈增加所以C无关。

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-8-1 12:16

ACDE 应该都不对. B相对好些. 可以这样理解.
经济好时, 一部分学生去花钱读私立学校,student/teacher的比例变小. 经济不好时,student/teacher的比例加大, 从而要求teacher数量增加. 加强了题干.

-- by 会员 wycg (2011/7/30 13:41:25)

经济不好时，V州的教育不会受到影响，教师工作不减少。
经济好时，有25%的人去了私立学校，就能说明问题么？

作者: wycg 时间: 2011-8-1 12:20

-- by 会员 wycg (2011/7/30 13:41:25)

经济不好时，V州的教育不会受到影响，教师工作不减少。
经济好时，有25%的人去了私立学校，就能说明问题么？

-- by 会员 evelyn205205 (2011/8/1 12:16:25)

你注意体干里面说到的student/teacher的比例不能小. 经济好时,有一部份学生去了私立,经济不好时,就算这部分人回流回公立,那teacher的人数也不会减少.还有可能会增加.

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-8-1 12:21

-- by 会员 wycg (2011/7/30 13:41:25)

经济不好时，V州的教育不会受到影响，教师工作不减少。
经济好时，有25%的人去了私立学校，就能说明问题么？

-- by 会员 evelyn205205 (2011/8/1 12:16:25)

-- by 会员 wycg (2011/8/1 12:20:30)

一针见血！

作者: canallaker 时间: 2011-8-9 08:52
按你们的意思student/teacher的比例应该越大越好么不然我觉得A对啊原文的意思是不要减少教师的数量如果student/teacher的比例过大的话那么应该教师的数量较少所以证明了不应该减少教师的数量 A中说如今已经比过去萧条时期的比例还要高就说明这个比重过大教师的数量不能减少了

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-8-9 09:52

按你们的意思student/teacher的比例应该越大越好么不然我觉得A对啊原文的意思是不要减少教师的数量如果student/teacher的比例过大的话那么应该教师的数量较少所以证明了不应该减少教师的数量 A中说如今已经比过去萧条时期的比例还要高就说明这个比重过大教师的数量不能减少了

-- by 会员 canallaker (2011/8/9 8:52:16)

不是比例越大越好啊。
经济不好的时候，公立学校要免费，且不能超过现在学生和教师的比例，即学生不能超过老师的。所以V地的教师岗位不会受到影响。那么经济好的时候在私立学校的学生就要来到公立学校来读书，学生多了，那么老师也得增多，不然比例就会变大。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)