标题: FEIFEI77 [打印本页] 作者: cyx3271 时间: 2011-7-28 17:01 标题: FEIFEI77 77. How do the airlines expect to prevent commercial plane crashes? Studies have shown that pilot error contributes to two-thirds of all such crashes. To address this problem, the airline have upgraded their training programs by increasing the hours of classroom instruction and emphasizing communication skills in the cockpit. But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots’ lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes.
Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the argument depends?
A.Training programs can eliminate pilot errors.
B.Commercial pilot routinely undergo additional training throughout their careers.
C.The number of airline crashes will decrease if pilot training programs focus on increasing actual flying time.
D.Lack of actual flying time is an important contributor to pilot error in commercial plane crashes.
E Communication skills are not important to pilot training programs.
我的理解是这样，也不知道对不对。与你分享！你也可以跟我交流，因为我也不是很懂。懵懵懂懂的。作者: cyx3271 时间: 2011-7-28 22:15
我没有感受到啊啊！囧 我是用的取非削弱方法 这样一来 很明显低削弱了啊 我感觉这两个选项是读可以的 但是就是不明白哪个跟好呢作者: chasingM7 时间: 2011-7-28 23:27
C.The number of airline crashes will decrease if pilot training programs focus on increasing actual flying time.
C merely rephase the premise given in the argument i think.
"To address this problem (crashes), blablablabla. But it is unrealistic to expect such measures to compensate for pilots’ lack of actual flying time." ==> in other words, it says "actual flying time will address the problem".
the underlying assumption is D. argument focuses on actual flying time will reduce accidents w/o mentioning the relationship between these two.