ChaseDream

标题: GWD15-Q19~迷惑中~ [打印本页]

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-28 11:28
标题: GWD15-Q19~迷惑中~
Aroca City currently funds its public schools through taxes on property.In place of this system, the city plans to introduce a sales tax of three percent on all retail sales in the city.Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes.The critics are correct on this point.Nevertheless, implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.Several large retailers have selected Aroca City as the site for huge new stores, and these are certain to draw large numbers of shoppers from neighboring municipalities, where sales are taxed at rates of six percent and more.In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.
In the argument given, the two potions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is an objection that has been raised against a certain plan; the second is a prediction that, if accurate, undermines the force of that objection.
B.The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is a point the argument makes in favor of adopting an alternative plan.
C.The first is a criticism, endorsed by the argument, of a funding plan; the second is the main reason cited by the argument for its endorsement of the criticism.
D.The first is a claim that the argument seeks to refute; the second is the main point used by the argument to show that the claim is false.
E.The first is a claim that the argument accepts with certain reservations; the second presents that claim in a rewarding that is not subject to those reservations.

此题答案是D。我选的是A。
在第一句boldface后面，作者不是说了一句the critics are correct on this point。那么就表示作者也同意的嘛，为什么D还说是refute呢？然后照A说，第二个粗体的是对第一个粗体的反对，这个同D一致，么？
好困惑，求NN解释，谢谢啦~

作者: 塔罗牌 时间: 2011-7-28 11:34
我想知道为什么不选C呢

作者: chasingM7 时间: 2011-7-28 11:51
A和D我觉得主要是对于第二个BF的解释不一样我觉得。第二个不是一个prediction.

1st BF: three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes
2nd BF: In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

第一个说retails sales tax less than property taxes. 然后后来nevertheless,后面就是其实不是这样，说了为什么。最后是基于以上原因，in consequence, retail sales will surge! 用来说明第一个BF部队。

A不对我认为第二个BF不是prediction.

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-28 11:54

A和D我觉得主要是对于第二个BF的解释不一样我觉得。第二个不是一个prediction.

1st BF: three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes
2nd BF: In consequence, retail sales in Aroca City are bound to increase substantially.

第一个说retails sales tax less than property taxes. 然后后来nevertheless,后面就是其实不是这样，说了为什么。最后是基于以上原因，in consequence, retail sales will surge! 用来说明第一个BF部队。

A不对我认为第二个BF不是prediction.

-- by 会员 chasingM7 (2011/7/28 11:51:06)

可是第一个作者没有推翻啊，作者说this point is correct耶~
求这位NN指教~

作者: chasingM7 时间: 2011-7-28 12:02
Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes.

The critics are correct on this point.

Nevertheless, implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.

author refutes the criticism from another aspact, that is, new sales will be generated.

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-28 14:22

Critics protest that three percent of current retail sales falls short of the amount raised for schools by property taxes.

The critics are correct on this point.

Nevertheless, implementing the plan will probably not reduce the money going to Aroca’s schools.

author refutes the criticism from another aspact, that is, new sales will be generated.

-- by 会员 chasingM7 (2011/7/28 12:02:08)

THX, I GOT IT FINALLY！

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-28 14:26

-- by 会员 chasingM7 (2011/7/28 11:51:06)

不对，我又有新的疑惑了，我同意作者是反对批评家的言论的，即retail sales要增加，但是为什么不是预测，未来发生的事情耶~
麻烦了，chasingM7~

作者: balapupu 时间: 2011-7-28 14:49
发表于: 3小时11分钟前 - IP:*.*.*.* 只看该用户大中小 #1
我想知道为什么不选C呢
你应该是没搞清楚endorsement 的意思把：背书, 签注(文件), 认可
所以，C说第二段黑体字是用来支持Criticism是不对的～

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-29 11:34
求解释啊，NN，我同意作者是反对批评家的言论的，即retail sales要增加，但是为什么不是预测，未来发生的事情耶~

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-29 20:37
求解释啊，NN~我觉得第二个是prediction嘛~

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-29 22:00
求助~

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-29 22:30
求助~

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-30 09:21
无力的顶~

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-30 10:12
继续顶~

作者: evelyn205205 时间: 2011-7-31 09:47
为什么第二个粗体不能被看作是prediction呢？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)