ChaseDream

标题: 这道题为什么跳跃修饰不行呢？很简单，但是就是不明白~~ [打印本页]

作者: 狂威雪 时间: 2011-7-27 23:11
标题: 这道题为什么跳跃修饰不行呢？很简单，但是就是不明白~~
187.United States Senator Daniel Inouye was appointed to several posts within the Democratic Party during his first term, that included assistant majority whip and vice-chair of the Democratic Senatorial Committee.

A.that included

B.which includes

C.including

D.some of which were

E.among them being
此题答案是C，我理解，但是D 答案呢？which可以跳跃修饰posts吧，Which与post之间隔的是介词短语啊？为什么不能跳跃修饰那？

作者: 狂威雪 时间: 2011-7-28 12:02
ding

作者: 狂威雪 时间: 2011-7-28 23:27
zaiding

作者: xxpatzz 时间: 2011-7-28 23:47
我觉得只有前面的modifier是mission critical modifier的时候才可以跳跃，这里 “within the Democratic Party during his first term” 的确是修饰post 担不是mission critical. 而且如果which可以跳跃修饰的话那前面不能有逗号。有了逗号就说明是 non-essential modifier。

不知道这么说LZ能理解吗？

作者: 狂威雪 时间: 2011-7-29 00:27

我觉得只有前面的modifier是mission critical modifier的时候才可以跳跃，这里 “within the Democratic Party during his first term” 的确是修饰post 担不是mission critical. 而且如果which可以跳跃修饰的话那前面不能有逗号。有了逗号就说明是 non-essential modifier。

不知道这么说LZ能理解吗？

-- by 会员 xxpatzz (2011/7/28 23:47:49)

嘿嘿~不好意思，能再详细点吗？什么是mission critical？为什么which 跳跃修饰前面不能有逗号呀？我貌似见了不少有逗号的情况呀~~嘿嘿~~详细点~~嘿嘿~~

作者: xxpatzz 时间: 2011-7-29 02:28
mission critical modifier 这个词是我从ManhattanGMAT 中看到。来举个书中的例子吧

He had a way OF DODGING OPPONENTS that impressed the scouts. 这里 of dodging opponents 是修饰way。。但是如果拿掉的话就不能清楚的表达是那种way impressed the scouts. 所以这里的that是跳跃修饰 a way 而不是 opponents.

如果which前面有逗号的话就说明这个modifier 是 non-essential modifier，就是整个modifier拿掉这个句子还是成立。比如说

Our system of Presidential elections favors states, such as Delaware, that by population are over-represented in the Electoral College.

这里such as Delaware就是non-essential modifier，拿掉的话不影响句子。注意such as Delaware前后都有逗号。

作者: ddswendy 时间: 2011-7-29 15:27
如果跳跃修饰应该是which include

作者: Vampirese 时间: 2011-7-29 21:31
楼上说的对，我觉得D主要错在改变了句子原意，本来说的是include，怎么就变成some了呢？而D的修饰应该是没问题的吧，如果单看D这句话应该没错吧。

作者: 狂威雪 时间: 2011-7-29 22:04

mission critical modifier 这个词是我从ManhattanGMAT 中看到。来举个书中的例子吧

He had a way OF DODGING OPPONENTS that impressed the scouts. 这里 of dodging opponents 是修饰way。。但是如果拿掉的话就不能清楚的表达是那种way impressed the scouts. 所以这里的that是跳跃修饰 a way 而不是 opponents.

如果which前面有逗号的话就说明这个modifier 是 non-essential modifier，就是整个modifier拿掉这个句子还是成立。比如说

Our system of Presidential elections favors states, such as Delaware, that by population are over-represented in the Electoral College.

这里such as Delaware就是non-essential modifier，拿掉的话不影响句子。注意such as Delaware前后都有逗号。

-- by 会员 xxpatzz (2011/7/29 2:28:24)

就是说限制性修饰短语是不可以被which跳跃修饰短语前面的名词，而非限制性的修饰语可以跳跃，是这个意思吗？？

作者: feifeionly 时间: 2011-9-3 14:33
From Manhattan

all constructions built on preposition + "which" - such as of which, from which, some of which, with which, etc. - must be used in the same way as "which" itself.

(b)"which" incorrectly applies to "first term"

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)