ChaseDream

标题: 快来看看~~急求~~这个歧义很难懂~ [打印本页]

作者: 狂威雪    时间: 2011-7-27 23:06
标题: 快来看看~~急求~~这个歧义很难懂~
prep1-97Industrialization and modern methods of insect control have improved the standard of living around the globe while at the same time they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants, having gone virtually unregulated since they were developed more than 50 years ago.这里面having可能修饰pollutants,也可能修饰they have introduced some 100,000 dangerous chemical pollutants整个分句,所以having产生了修饰歧义

having做状语修饰前面的句子,而having还可以做定语修饰前面的pollutant。那如何很明确的分清是修饰前面的句子还是名词呢?

作者: 狂威雪    时间: 2011-7-28 12:02
ding
作者: 橙色的鱼    时间: 2011-7-28 12:46
修饰名词的话,就把ing改成定语从句
作者: 狂威雪    时间: 2011-7-28 23:27
修饰名词的话,就把ing改成定语从句
-- by 会员 橙色的鱼 (2011/7/28 12:46:11)



按照这道题来说,ing 也可以修饰名词,不是吗?
这道题如何才能不产生歧义呢?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3