标题: 询问一道GWD题，个人表示非常不解，跪求大N解惑。。。 [打印本页] 作者: kissgod23 时间: 2011-7-26 15:17 标题: 询问一道GWD题，个人表示非常不解，跪求大N解惑。。。 Guidebook writer:I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
A.The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
B.Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
C.The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
D.The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.
E.The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
答案D。 表示非常不解，原文中并没提到1930年以前的房子都被废弃了啊，而且B选项貌似更合理，能容纳更多的客人，说明1930年以后的房子更牢靠嘛。。。。。。。作者: cyx3271 时间: 2011-7-26 15:37
D 的意思是 木工质量越好的房子 废弃的可能性就越小 意思是writer 走过的房子 已经是 质量很好 经得起时间的考验了 是这些房子质量superior to that after1930 但是不能说generally superior to the quality after 1930
B 应该是无关选项 能accommodate more people 又能说明什么呢作者: weijiejing 时间: 2011-7-26 17:00
如果如D所说质量不好的东西更容易被废弃, 那么有可能1930之前有很多质量不好的被废弃了, 作者根本就无法去参观那些被废弃的房子, 所以他可能只看到了那些最好的房子而没有机会去看那些被废弃的, 所以这样的比较根本就不公平