ChaseDream

标题: og12 sc 88 求解 求NN们啊,谢谢啦~~~~~!!!!不胜感激涕零~!! [打印本页]

作者: bob9603    时间: 2011-7-14 21:55
标题: og12 sc 88 求解 求NN们啊,谢谢啦~~~~~!!!!不胜感激涕零~!!
如题~
88.Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and
composer, produced a body of work both rooted
in the
stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and
Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from
the mainstream jazz repertory.
(A)Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and
composer, produced a body of work both rooted

(B)Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and composer,
produced a body of work that was rooted both

(C)Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk,
who produced a body of work rooted

(D)Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk
produced a body of work that was rooted

(E)Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk
produced a body of work rooted both


为什么选D呢,我觉得B挺好的啊,又有both and  ,还没有who was(wordy)
求NN们解答啊,谢谢啦~!!!!!!
最好每个选项都说一下,谢谢啦~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

作者: nemiah    时间: 2011-7-14 21:59
both in ... and in .... 而且这里也不需要both
作者: Trisica    时间: 2011-7-15 04:49
错在BOTH,这里不需要BOTH
作者: jj449    时间: 2011-7-15 07:05
lz有没有仔细看OG的解释啊,先看OG的解释才是正道啊~
作者: 意韵甜心    时间: 2011-7-15 09:50
both...and...两个“...”部分要一致,原句的意思是TM的作品从俩人那里发展的,非要加both也应该是:
Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and
composer, produced a body of work rooted in the
stride-piano tradition of both Willie (The Lion) Smith and
Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from
the mainstream jazz repertory.

另外,用从句修饰也没有直接说Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk简洁有力,主语TM跟后面的谓语动词Produced离得越近越好
作者: bob9603    时间: 2011-7-15 10:14
both in ... and in .... 而且这里也不需要both
-- by 会员 nemiah (2011/7/14 21:59:00)

我的意思是B中的both能不能说是并列willie smith 和 duke ellington 这两个人名~是不是说in the stride-piano tradition of 这部分属于这两者共有的,所以both应该出现在of 之后?
作者: bob9603    时间: 2011-7-15 10:15
错在BOTH,这里不需要BOTH
-- by 会员 Trisica (2011/7/15 4:49:00)

我的意思是B中的both能不能说是并列willie smith 和 duke ellington 这两个人名~是不是说in the stride-piano tradition of 这部分属于这两者共有的,所以both应该出现在of 之后?
作者: bob9603    时间: 2011-7-15 10:17
lz有没有仔细看OG的解释啊,先看OG的解释才是正道啊~
-- by 会员 jj449 (2011/7/15 7:05:41)

谢谢提醒哈O(∩_∩)O,我看过og上的解释,但是觉得这题再做能做对,但就是想知道这个both怎么放才正确~

我的意思是B中的both能不能说是并列willie smith 和 duke ellington 这两个人名~是不是说in the stride-piano tradition of 这部分属于这两者共有的,所以both应该出现在of 之后?
作者: bob9603    时间: 2011-7-15 10:19
both...and...两个“...”部分要一致,原句的意思是TM的作品从俩人那里发展的,非要加both也应该是:
Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and
composer, produced a body of work rooted in the
stride-piano tradition of both Willie (The Lion) Smith and
Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from
the mainstream jazz repertory.

另外,用从句修饰也没有直接说Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk简洁有力,主语TM跟后面的谓语动词Produced离得越近越好
-- by 会员 意韵甜心 (2011/7/15 9:50:35)

你的解释我很满意啊~!谢谢啦,但我就是有个小问题,虽然Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk简洁有力,但咱们平时的感觉,不都是像B那样介绍人嘛?(ps:我有点凭感觉了这里~麻烦指点一下~)O(∩_∩)O
作者: 意韵甜心    时间: 2011-7-15 12:39
both...and...两个“...”部分要一致,原句的意思是TM的作品从俩人那里发展的,非要加both也应该是:
Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and
composer, produced a body of work rooted in the
stride-piano tradition of both Willie (The Lion) Smith and
Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from
the mainstream jazz repertory.

另外,用从句修饰也没有直接说Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk简洁有力,主语TM跟后面的谓语动词Produced离得越近越好
-- by 会员 意韵甜心 (2011/7/15 9:50:35)


你的解释我很满意啊~!谢谢啦,但我就是有个小问题,虽然Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk简洁有力,但咱们平时的感觉,不都是像B那样介绍人嘛?(ps:我有点凭感觉了这里~麻烦指点一下~)O(∩_∩)O
-- by 会员 bob9603 (2011/7/15 10:19:39)



所以简洁有力还不是排除他的理由,Both才是~~如果遇到特恶心的题,这个答案是最不恶心的,both那也没有硬伤的话(注意看我改了Both的位置哦),B这种表达也没问题。
作者: bob9603    时间: 2011-7-15 12:51
both...and...两个“...”部分要一致,原句的意思是TM的作品从俩人那里发展的,非要加both也应该是:
Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and
composer, produced a body of work rooted in the
stride-piano tradition of both Willie (The Lion) Smith and
Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from
the mainstream jazz repertory.

另外,用从句修饰也没有直接说Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk简洁有力,主语TM跟后面的谓语动词Produced离得越近越好
-- by 会员 意韵甜心 (2011/7/15 9:50:35)



你的解释我很满意啊~!谢谢啦,但我就是有个小问题,虽然Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk简洁有力,但咱们平时的感觉,不都是像B那样介绍人嘛?(ps:我有点凭感觉了这里~麻烦指点一下~)O(∩_∩)O
-- by 会员 bob9603 (2011/7/15 10:19:39)




所以简洁有力还不是排除他的理由,Both才是~~如果遇到特恶心的题,这个答案是最不恶心的,both那也没有硬伤的话(注意看我改了Both的位置哦),B这种表达也没问题。
-- by 会员 意韵甜心 (2011/7/15 12:39:30)

谢谢啦,刚开始看到你both改位置,我就明白我哪里错了~谢谢啦~!O(∩_∩)O
作者: fpd    时间: 2012-11-19 20:58
请问。这里both的用法能不能理解为把中间的rooted in the stride-piano tradition of 省略了?
作者: abjure    时间: 2012-11-19 21:25
请问。这里both的用法能不能理解为把中间的rooted in the stride-piano tradition of 省略了?
-- by 会员 fpd (2012/11/19 20:58:44)



这个理解不对,在GMAT里
both A and B属于严格的平行标准词。
还有 either... or...
A和B要对等。

你说的平行里面的省略有, 但是发生在 but, and(这些单个连接词)
作者: fpd    时间: 2012-12-2 23:53
请问。这里both的用法能不能理解为把中间的rooted in the stride-piano tradition of 省略了?
-- by 会员 fpd (2012/11/19 20:58:44)




这个理解不对,在GMAT里
both A and B属于严格的平行标准词。
还有 either... or...
A和B要对等。

你说的平行里面的省略有, 但是发生在 but, and(这些单个连接词)
-- by 会员 abjure (2012/11/19 21:25:59)


明白了,谢大叔!~
作者: 醒醒Shine    时间: 2014-2-11 22:08
意韵甜心 发表于 2011-7-15 12:39
both...and...两个“...”部分要一致,原句的意思是TM的作品从俩人那里发展的,非要加both也应该是: ...

同意你的观点  人名,人的身份或职业,做同位语插入,是很正常的用法,并不存在D选项硬是怎么简洁有力了。OG别的题目里经常会出现啊,人名,人的身份职业,后面再接着写句子。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3