标题: A recent national study of the public schools shows that there is now one microc [打印本页] 作者: hs1988520 时间: 2011-7-14 17:03 标题: A recent national study of the public schools shows that there is now one microc 请问这里为什么用的是were。而不是was呢作者: beebee94 时间: 2011-8-18 12:49
同不懂~up作者: 332 时间: 2011-8-18 18:10
同不懂~up作者: AlohaDJ 时间: 2011-8-18 19:18
关键是有含was的选项么？ were/was在这句话里强调一个过去时态。 lz能否把原题贴上来看看。。作者: 像个孩子 时间: 2015-11-7 03:47
这道题还是没有搞懂。大牛能不能来解释一下。为什么要用four times as many as there were. 这个were后面代表着什么，if it represents "one microPC for every 32 students", then it should be was instead of were不是吗？求解求解
og－89. A recent national study of the public schools shows that there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were four years ago.
(A) there are now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(B) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many than there were
(C) there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were
(D) every thirty-two pupils now have one microcomputer, four times as many than there were作者: 曾屁股捷 时间: 2019-3-20 17:25
像个孩子 发表于 2015-11-7 03:47
这道题还是没有搞懂。大牛能不能来解释一下。为什么要用four times as many as there were. 这个were后面代 ...
这里应该是比较结构要前后平行的问题吧。A recent national study of the public schools shows that there is now one microcomputer for every thirty-two pupils, four times as many as there were (computers) four years ago.
这个句子里面是microcomputer 和 computer（或microcomputer，反正是同类事物）比较。但是如果是DE的话，就变成了microcomputer 和 four years ago 比较。
这个是我个人理解，如果大家觉得这种理解有问题麻烦帮忙指出来啦！谢谢！作者: 奎尼米兰达 时间: 2019-3-23 09:45
因为是many所以要用were吧？还是不懂E为什么不对，不可以理解成比较has后的宾语吗？