ChaseDream

标题: SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(十三)Formal Logic (1) [打印本页]

作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2011-7-13 12:06
标题: SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(十三)Formal Logic (1)
If-Then Statements

Example: If you run a red light in Beijing, then youwill get a ticket for 300 RMB.

To diagram this statement, let’s shorten the original statement byrepresenting each clause with one letter:

If R, then T.

R stands for “you run a red light in Beijing”

T stands for “you will get a ticket for 300 RMB”

From the original statement, we can infer that:

If not T, then not R.

In other words, if someone has never gotten a ticket (not T), then thatperson must not have run a red light in Beijing (not R). Basically, the newstatement switches the clauses and then negates both variables. This newif-then statement or inference is called a “contrapositive.” If the originalstatement is true, then contrapositive must also be true. Because both theoriginal and the contrapositive statements are logically equivalent, thecontrapositive is just another way of stating the original statement.

CommonMistakes

The problem is that many people apply only one of the steps above. Theyonly switch or they only negate. Neither of these two operations on theoriginal statement will produce an equivalent of the original one.

Original: If you run a red light in Beijing, then youwill get a ticket for 300 RMB. (If R, then T.)

Mistake one: If you got a ticket for 300 RMB, then you rana red light in Beijing. (If T, then R.)

The problem is you might be fined because you were speeding, not becauseyou were running a red light. So we cannot conclude that “you ran a red light”simply because “you got a ticket.”

Mistake two: If you did not run a red light in Beijing, then youwill not get a ticket for 300 RMB.

Again, this statement is obviously wrong since you could get a ticketfor speeding.

Negating And and Or

When you negate and, it becomes or.And when you negate or, it becomes and.

Example:

Statement: If you eat a poison,you will get sick and call your mom.

If P, then S and M

Contrapositive:

If you did not get sick or did not call your mom, you did not eat a poison.

If not S or not M, then not P.

It is important to use or herebecause using and wouldgo too far.

Only If

Like the words if and then,the phrase onlyif can also create andif-then relationship. But it can be confusing. Even though onlyif ends with if it does not introduce the if-clause.In fact, onlyif introduce the then-clause;whatever comes immediately afteronly if is then then-clause. The rest of thestatement is the if-clause.

Example:

Ming attends the meeting only if Hua attends.

Translation: If Ming attends the meeting, then Hua attends.

Only if you wear a shirt will you enter this restaurant.

Translation: If you enter this restaurant, then you were a shirt.

If andOnly If

The phrase if and only if actually introduces two rules. Consider thisexample:

The Shanghai Shark will win the tournament if, and only if, it has YaoMing as its center.

In this sentence, both if and onlyif introduce the lastclause—“it has Yao Ming as its center.” Yet if introducesif-clause and only if introducesthen-clause.

Translation: “If Shanghai Shark has Yao Ming as its center, then it willwin the tournament” and “If the Shanghai Shark won the tournament, then it hadYao Ming as its center.”

SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(十二)Principles


SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(十四)Formal Logic (2)

作者: jameshzd    时间: 2011-7-13 14:19
沙发沙发!!!啊啊啊!SDCAR2010的帖子我绝对的支持,可是最近忙的做GWD。。。实在是忙不过来啊。。。
作者: 灭绝湿太    时间: 2011-7-13 14:35
哈哈又有新的了!!!!
作者: sanlingjie    时间: 2011-7-13 16:08
HELLO, LZ, I am confused by this example:Example:

Ming attends the meeting only if Hua attends.

Translation: If Hua attends the meeting, then Ming attends.


U said In fact, only if introduce the then-clause; whatever comes immediately after only if is then then-clause. However, in this example, only if introduces the IF-Clause, right? So, is there something improper here?
作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2011-7-14 01:07
HELLO, LZ, I am confused by this example:Example:

Ming attends the meeting only if Hua attends.

Translation: If Hua attends the meeting, then Ming attends.


U said In fact, only if introduce the then-clause; whatever comes immediately after only if is then then-clause. However, in this example, only if introduces the IF-Clause, right? So, is there something improper here?
-- by 会员 sanlingjie (2011/7/13 16:08:00)



You are right. I will correct right away.  Good job.
作者: MarsTOF    时间: 2011-7-15 17:36
这章看的太纠结了。。
作者: 米样    时间: 2011-7-15 21:58
我的理解是,这章讲了两个问题,前半部分其实就是“你否命题”;后面半部分的“if和 only if”,说白了就是“充分条件和必要条件”。
请问楼主,我对后半部分的理解对吗?前面肯定是对的,大家都学过高中数学的~
作者: 米样    时间: 2011-7-15 21:59
oh,no,“逆否命题”,大家鄙视死我吧。。。
作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2011-7-16 00:06
我的理解是,这章讲了两个问题,前半部分其实就是“你否命题”;后面半部分的“if和 only if”,说白了就是“充分条件和必要条件”。
请问楼主,我对后半部分的理解对吗?前面肯定是对的,大家都学过高中数学的~
-- by 会员 米样 (2011/7/15 21:58:19)



Quite right.
作者: VincentShu    时间: 2011-7-23 15:37
SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(十三)Formal Logic (1)?    
Maybe this is twelve
作者: AlohaDJ    时间: 2011-7-23 18:04
疑问同上。。
LZ这个系列里面没有第(十二)部分,还是我漏掉了呢?

请NN明示了..THKS.
作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2011-7-23 20:07
疑问同上。。
LZ这个系列里面没有第(十二)部分,还是我漏掉了呢?

请NN明示了..THKS.
-- by 会员 AlohaDJ (2011/7/23 18:04:20)



http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-573332-1-1.html
作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2011-7-23 20:08
SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(十三)Formal Logic (1)?    
Maybe this is twelve
-- by 会员 VincentShu (2011/7/23 15:37:04)



http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-573332-1-1.html
作者: ffen    时间: 2011-9-18 09:54
LZ NN,我也觉得only if,貌似有点问题,请问有修改过了的么?感觉only if也是引导if部分的,有种only...when的feel...请NN指教呀!谢谢~~
作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2011-9-18 11:04
LZ NN,我也觉得only if,貌似有点问题,请问有修改过了的么?感觉only if也是引导if部分的,有种only...when的feel...请NN指教呀!谢谢~~
-- by 会员 ffen (2011/9/18 9:54:27)



Only if = Then. Not IF.
作者: ffen    时间: 2011-9-18 18:06
44.   (33799-!-item-!-188;#058&007092)

In countries in which newlife-sustaining drugs cannot be patented, such drugs are sold at widelyaffordable prices; those same drugs, where patented, command premium pricesbecause the patents shield patent-holding manufacturers from competitors.  These facts show that future access to newlife-sustaining drugs can be improved if the practice of granting patents onnewly developed life-sustaining drugs were to be abolished everywhere.

Which of the following, if true,most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In countries in whichlife-sustaining drugs cannot be patented, their manufacture is nevertheless aprofitable enterprise.

(B) Countries that do not currentlygrant patents on life-sustaining drugs are, for the most part, countries withlarge populations.

(C) In some countries specificprocesses for the manufacture of pharmaceutical drugs can be patented even incases in which the drugs themselves cannot be patented.

(D) Pharmaceutical companies canafford the research that goes into the development of new drugs only if patentsallow them to earn high profits.

(E) Countries that grant patents onlife-sustaining drugs almost always ban their importation from countries thatdo not grant such patents.

这题里面only if是then的话,是不是D就是: If pharmaceutical companies can afford the research that goes into the development of new drugs, then parents allow them to earn high profits. ?我怎么觉得意思反了呢...还是我没有正确理解你说的if...then的意思...><

还有3楼指出来的例子,我也和他有一样的看法诶...

唉,被CR搞的好头大啊...现在手上的题目我感觉大多数都能找出答案来,就怕上了考场不行啊,已经要3战了...

先谢过NN总是给我们解答啊~~不胜感激!

作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2011-9-18 20:59
D就是: If pharmaceutical companies can afford the research that goes into the development of new drugs, then parents allow them to earn high profits.

"parents allow them to earn high profits" is required (necessary) for "pharmaceutical companies to afford the research that goes into the development of new drugs."

IF leads a sufficient condition, THEN leads a necessary condition.
作者: ffen    时间: 2011-9-18 21:58
不好意思呀...我还是在搞...接着问您...><看了6楼的“充分条件和必要条件”,瞬间好像明白了点。也就是说,我们看到的传统的if开头的句子,是表达“充分条件”意思的,only if呢就是表达“必要条件”的。你提到的if and only if就是“充分必要"的...
那你文中提到的if-clause和then-clause是指句子里的if引导的部分和then引导的部分嘛?那我如果没有看到only if如何分辨呢?就比如:If you run a red light in Beijing, then you will get a ticket for 300RMB. 这个我根据意思就是会读成充分条件(R=>T),但是这里面不是同时有if和then了么?如果把刚刚那题的D直接改成if...then...的形式,我读出来还会是充分条件(afford=>high profits)...


额...NN能明白我意思么...我觉得我今天是绕进去了...再有问题我一定明天问!让它自然沉淀下...囧
谢谢!
作者: QUARTZ7    时间: 2011-10-7 10:49
不好意思呀...我还是在搞...接着问您...><看了6楼的“充分条件和必要条件”,瞬间好像明白了点。也就是说,我们看到的传统的if开头的句子,是表达“充分条件”意思的,only if呢就是表达“必要条件”的。你提到的if and only if就是“充分必要"的...
那你文中提到的if-clause和then-clause是指句子里的if引导的部分和then引导的部分嘛?那我如果没有看到only if如何分辨呢?就比如:If you run a red light in Beijing, then you will get a ticket for 300RMB. 这个我根据意思就是会读成充分条件(R=>T),但是这里面不是同时有if和then了么?如果把刚刚那题的D直接改成if...then...的形式,我读出来还会是充分条件(afford=>high profits)...


额...NN能明白我意思么...我觉得我今天是绕进去了...再有问题我一定明天问!让它自然沉淀下...囧
谢谢!
-- by 会员 ffen (2011/9/18 21:58:22)



不是特别明白你的问题……但我觉得是if引导的从句是then从句的充分条件,反之,then引导的从句是if引导的从句的必要条件。例如If you run a red light in Beijing, then you will get a ticket for 300RMB.这个句子是同时有If和then, 但它说明的是你闯红灯就会导致罚款(充分),或者,如果你没有被罚款,就说明你没有闯红灯(罚款对闯红灯是必要的)。if...then...同时出现不矛盾。

这样的题靠逻辑意思理解也可以,靠公式,比如数学的原命题=逆否命题也可以。

不知道有没有回答的问题……呵呵,还是请SDCAR2010指教吧:)
作者: bonfin    时间: 2011-10-31 12:21
充分条件标志:if/when/whenever/every/all/any/people who/in order to/by
作者: bonfin    时间: 2011-10-31 12:23
必要条件标志:then/only/only if/must/required/unless/except/until/without
作者: reyanwoo    时间: 2012-2-7 17:17
got it
thank you
作者: 812966141    时间: 2012-4-17 16:37
关于only if。你是解释的最清楚的!onlyif = then clause```!!!!!!!!!
作者: 晓野的野    时间: 2013-3-26 00:36
前面一部分讲的是充分条件 很好理解
only if 讲的是必要条件 这个稍难理解一点了
作者: ken121222    时间: 2013-4-18 21:54
I learned a lot. thank you!
作者: wjtwenzi    时间: 2013-8-13 18:53
Find a little tiny mistake in your passage:
"Translation: If you enter this restaurant, then you were a shirt."
Obviously "wear" is the right word ;)
作者: wjtwenzi    时间: 2013-8-13 18:55
VincentShu 发表于 2011-7-23 15:37
SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(十三)Formal Logic (1)? &nbsp; &nbsp;Maybe this is twelve

http://forum.chasedream.com/thread-573332-1-1.html
Here is 12 ;)
作者: virgmat    时间: 2013-8-24 21:17
sdcar2010 发表于 2011-9-18 20:59
D就是: If pharmaceutical companies can afford the research that goes into the development of new dru ...

觉得这句话的没转换准确,应该是〜

(D) Pharmaceutical companies canafford the research that goes into the development of new drugs only if patentsallow them to earn high profits.
= if pharmaceutical companies can afford the research that goes into the development of new drugs, then patents HAVE allowed them to earn high profit.

请指教〜
作者: 醒醒Shine    时间: 2014-4-2 16:28
以前对only if一直有误解!谢谢楼主!终于明白only if引导的是必要条件啊,if引导的才是充分条件!
作者: zhangyanlele    时间: 2014-4-9 22:17
解释的好清楚,终于搞懂了他们的区别!
作者: echogmj    时间: 2015-1-16 23:33
thx for sharing ~~~~
作者: Jacklizk    时间: 2015-10-1 17:17
牛主,可否看下我的理解是否正确:
原文凝练:if abolish-》then improve
正确选项D: if improve->then Not abolish
如果是增强的话:if Not improve, then not abolish
所以是削弱,这样理解正确吗?
同是CR问题学生,有些时候真是抓不到点上;
作者: VincentFSJ    时间: 2016-9-12 10:16
这么好的东西居然没有人顶!
作者: sa0314    时间: 2018-6-9 13:28
Mark一下!               
作者: 梦季    时间: 2018-6-12 10:34
顶楼主!               
作者: 梦季    时间: 2018-6-12 10:37
感谢分享!               




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3