ChaseDream

标题: prep 08 210啊! [打印本页]

作者: jianaozhonghua    时间: 2011-7-8 03:30
标题: prep 08 210啊!
210.(29708-!-item-!-188;#058&004436)(GWD-12-Q31)



Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother andended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

选E
三个疑问:
1. A里面的outnumbering当成伴随理解不行么?为甚笔记要说是完全没关系的呢?  我觉得就是说,给她写了好多好多信, (伴随状态)超过了所有给别人的信

2. B里面的黑体字被说成是没有主语,不理解

3. DE里面which指代正确是因为which不能指人所以就只能指代letter就灭有歧义了么?

谢谢!!


作者: nemiah    时间: 2011-7-8 07:00
如果是伴随也应该是信的数量outnumbering而不是信,即主句主语应改变
作者: jianaozhonghua    时间: 2011-7-8 08:54
outnumbering这么说的话,如果表示伴随应该有明确的符合逻辑的逻辑主语。懂了
作者: vinbobo    时间: 2011-7-8 09:36
所谓逻辑主语的解释是不对的
outnumber不是数量作主语的,如
a town where men outnumber women four to one

A建议这样理解,从语义上,你说一个事情从什么时候开始到什么时候结束是意义不大的,你看全文可以大致发现,其实应该这句强调的是后面一半。
反之,如果强调时间段,那么补充后面的伴随状语是没有意义的,因为其他部分意义已经很丰满

此外:这题的背景是,这两个女人是妯娌,又是同性恋,所以强调信数量比别人都多
作者: vinbobo    时间: 2011-7-8 09:38
which没有歧义,是因为be written这个动作不可能是人发起的

Outnumber没有主语,是因为主句以及很完整了,没有连词的情况下,不能直接出现这么个动词
作者: nemiah    时间: 2011-7-8 19:31
嗯,同意楼上的意见。伴随状语的问题应该解释为:修饰前面整个句子,而从逻辑上讲第一句的意思和outnumber不符合。
作者: jianaozhonghua    时间: 2011-7-8 22:42
所谓逻辑主语的解释是不对的
outnumber不是数量作主语的,如
a town where men outnumber women four to one

A建议这样理解,从语义上,你说一个事情从什么时候开始到什么时候结束是意义不大的,你看全文可以大致发现,其实应该这句强调的是后面一半。
反之,如果强调时间段,那么补充后面的伴随状语是没有意义的,因为其他部分意义已经很丰满

此外:这题的背景是,这两个女人是妯娌,又是同性恋,所以强调信数量比别人都多
-- by 会员 vinbobo (2011/7/8 9:36:22)


谢谢 两层内容讲的都很好。懂了!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3