ChaseDream

标题: 好难的一道逻辑啊-来自陈向东逻辑-归纳-Konstantin Stanislavsky那道 [打印本页]

作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-7 17:22
标题: 好难的一道逻辑啊-来自陈向东逻辑-归纳-Konstantin Stanislavsky那道
Konstantin Stanislavsky’s justly praised method for training actors arose from Stanislavsky’s own awkwardness and susceptibility to theatrical clichés as a young actor. The method must be understood in terms of Stanislavsky’s personal research for release from the temptations of stock gestures, well-tried vocal intonations and standard emotional formulas. Despite the pretensions of certain of his disciples in USA, the Russian director never intended to formulate a textbook of rigid solutions to acting problems.

It can be inferred that the author of the preceding statements about Stanislavsky’s method holds which of the following opinions about acting?

A.Acting is essentially spontaneous emotional expression, with which systematic training usually interferes.
B.The Stanislavsky’s method has lost some of its flexibility and exploratory qualities as it has been used by some followers of Stanislavsky in USA.
C.The Stanislavski method has misled those actors in the United States who have adopted it.
D.Virtually the only advice young actors need be given is that they must systematically suppress theatrical clichés in their performances.
E.The Stanislavski method is useful primarily for young actors who must overcome artificiality and immaturity in their performances.


这道题选的是B。可是为什么A不对呢?
解释里说A表达的是KS的观点,而非作者的观点。
为什么不能理解为是作者的观点呢?
不理解啊,好难的一道题,困惑了。
看过以前有个讨论帖的,但是没有下文的分析,只说答案是B。
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-7 17:32
求助啊~旁友~
作者: spoiledchild    时间: 2011-7-7 17:44
with which systematic training usually interferes这半句题干里面没有提到吧
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-7 18:13
“the temptations of stock gestures, well-tried vocal intonations and standard emotional formulas”不能理解为systematic training么?
作者: Rainbeauty    时间: 2011-7-8 09:25
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: Rainbeauty    时间: 2011-7-8 09:26
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-8 11:22
我也想问:E为什么不对呢???
-- by 会员 Rainbeauty (2011/7/8 9:26:15)



在原文中没有提到年轻演员表演的造作和不成熟啊~not mentioned information。
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-8 11:28
前面有个release from。。。
-- by 会员 Rainbeauty (2011/7/8 9:25:15)



?然后呢?
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-9 16:15
为什么A不对呢?
作者: 青冥    时间: 2011-7-9 16:29
我觉得A的前半句貌似与原文关系不大诶

LZ认为A为什么对呢?
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-9 16:40
你是觉得原文的重点在最后一句么?
作者: 青冥    时间: 2011-7-9 16:43
恩恩~对的 而且前半句确实没有明确提及呀
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-9 17:16
在原文的前半段中,作者说这位大师把表演从过去的陈腐,死板中解脱出来,作者是认同的啊~
作者: 青冥    时间: 2011-7-9 17:24
囧~
我说的是选项A的前半句 Acting is essentially spontaneous emotional expression没有出处
作者: evelyn205205    时间: 2011-7-9 17:31
我知道你说的是选项A前半句没有出处啊,我的意思是,原文这位大师的贡献是作者认同的,那为什么不能推出A呢?
作者: chenpeiwen1207    时间: 2011-7-17 13:01
因为你看一下题目中的问题就会发现他说的是infer from the author‘s opinions,所以是B啊,
A 的话就是ks这个人的观点的总结啦
作者: 小妤儿    时间: 2012-10-26 23:36
我觉得首先从问题来讲,It can be inferred that the author of the preceding statements about Stanislavski's method holds which of the following opinions about acting? 问题问的是作者对S方法所持有的观点。而并不是作者对acting所持有的观点,所以A错误。E中The Stanislavski method is useful primarily for young actors who must overcome artificiality and immaturity in their performances.的primarily for young,段落中并没有表示出这层含义,所以E也不正确。实际文中并没有明确的表示出作者的观点具体是什么,而是引出了Russian director 的观点,前面的内容只是在客观的陈述S方法的一些background information,所以认为作者引用Russian director 就是为了说明自己的观点。从而选B.   这是我在做这道题时的一些想法。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3