Assemblyman Hansen, my opponent in this election campaign, has accused me of using money from the public coffers for personal vacations and other private expenses. Hansen has no right to make such accusations, since the record shows that she hired her own daughter at a handsome salary to serve as a legislative aide.
Which of the following is the most serious weakness of the argument above?
A) It assumes that anything that Hansen has done is all right.
B) It confuses legality with ethical propriety.
C) It assumes that Hansen's action would be indictable under current law
D) It fails to respond to the charges made by Hansen.
E) It implies that Hansen should be held responsible for questionable actions by members of her family.
答案是D，但是没看明白！NN给详细讲讲吧！多谢了！
tianwanGG,你一直在答疑解惑啊！在我眼里够N了！(不是PMP)呵呵，真的！
你的意思是说，原文说H攻击他花公款，但是他反攻只强调H利用工作之便安插自己的女儿。反攻没说到点子上？这就是他的flaw?
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |