ChaseDream

标题: GWD-12/31 [打印本页]
作者: 九山环一湖    时间: 2004-6-27 16:18
标题: GWD-12/31

Q31:


Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.




  • Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

  • Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

  • Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering

  • Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering

  • Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
    • 作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-27 16:35

    Now I am in favor of E. The sense of A is hard to understand. though A doesn't violate any grammar rule.

    作者: wanze    时间: 2004-6-28 09:43

    a?

    作者: mumuwa    时间: 2004-6-28 19:45

    这个题我觉得有必要探讨一下，这个题的BCD有明显的句子结构问题，主要看A还是E，偶开始也选的A，看到tianwan提示，我又觉得E对，后来想想，A还是有合理性的。


    A's letters to B were written over a period（开始到结束好长好长的时间，一直到死前啊） 。。。, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.


    outnumbering 的功能，在白勇的书里，-ING分词短语在句未：1）伴随动作、状态和功能，与句子谓语动作同时发生，逻辑主语等于句子主语；2）伴随结果，整个句子是原因，到时分词动作产生，无逻辑主语。


    这样，可不可以这样理解，前半句（主句）在讲这个爱美丽同志的信写了N年的时间（可能与她写其他信不大一样），所以造成了给这同一个收信人的信的数量大大超过了给其他GG的？


    关于这个伴随的用法，OG里有一例，大家体会一下，能不能算A对？


    259. Five fledgling sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.


    (A) bringing


    (B) and brings


    (C) and it brings


    (D) and it brought（A）


    (E) and brought


    Choice A is best. The “-ing” (present participle) form introduces action that is simultaneous with the action of the main clause; i.e., bringing indicates that the number of wild birds became 34 when the sea eagles left their nests.


    可是如果原题中A对了，又怎么去推翻E呢？好为难啊～


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-28 19:46:13编辑过]
    作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-28 19:58

    A的主句是系表结构，mumuwa的例子里的主句是动宾结构。所以本题和mumuwa的例子是2回事。

    outnumbering是伴随动作还是结果？A的系表结构导致了无法判定outnumbering的意义。

    所以只有E是对的。

    remarks expecting......

    作者: mumuwa    时间: 2004-6-28 20:14
    可是这是一个被动语态，不是纯粹的系表，我觉得好像有动作在里面的～ 越来越觉得理亏的说～
    作者: tulipmontreal    时间: 2004-6-28 20:45

    穆穆注意句子中心, 这个句子的主干是说Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington outnumber her letters to anyone else, 而伴随结构是从属结构所以E正确,而且非常清晰! 请看下面例子:

    Dickinson's surviving letters to Susan, which began ardently a few years before Susan's marriage and continued almost until the poet's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.

    作者: rhod    时间: 2004-6-28 20:51

    查了OG里的几个和分词作状语有关的题目，没有发现有用被动语态的。而且，choice A这样的结构的确奇怪。

    所以，我觉得tianwan的说法要修正一下，不是因为系表结构，而是因为被动结构用分词作状语意思太怪了。

    作者: kingsoft    时间: 2004-6-28 21:43

        系表结构就不能用分词表伴随吗??不是很明白，斑竹可有证明？？

        即使不能表示伴随动作，也可以表示伴随结果。那就无所谓系表结构了啊？？

        我还有个问题：A中的分词beginning...and ending...修饰a period，可以这样用吗？？

       

       

    作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-28 22:26

    nod，nod。sorry, 我说错了，是被动式。被动式用现在分词伴随或结果状语意思比较怪。这一句用结果肯定意思不能理解，要是伴随，也不对。

    不是系表，我给拧了。不过be型系表结构一般也是是不带分词结果和伴随状语的。be性系表结构一般是指状态，不是动作。

    作者: mumuwa    时间: 2004-6-29 00:43
    以下是引用tulipmontreal在2004-6-28 20:45:00的发言：

    穆穆注意句子中心, 这个句子的主干是说Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington outnumber her letters to anyone else, 而伴随结构是从属结构所以E正确,而且非常清晰! 请看下面例子:


    Dickinson's surviving letters to Susan, which began ardently a few years before Susan's marriage and continued almost until the poet's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.


    这个句子好道地的，而且和我们讨论的题目就好像是双胞胎，不是小郁自己编的吧？的确谓语如果是outnumber很清楚。

    还有，我觉得这个句子里用的定语从句就比原来题目里用分词修饰period要好，因为里面有明确的时间状语啊，可既然是答案就不好说什么了。

    我慢慢明白了一些道理，关于分词坐伴随，其实还是伴随动作的，分词本身就是一种动作性很强的形式，所以被动态还有系表是无法引出这样的结果的。

    谢谢大家！

    作者: rt316    时间: 2004-7-29 03:06

    现分做状语可以表示伴随，也可表示结果，即因果；所以，我认为这题A表达得很清楚，E明显重心改变。

    作者: piscesstar    时间: 2004-11-30 06:14

    这个题还是选E好一些，

    Dickinson's surviving letters to Susan, which began ardently a few years before Susan's marriage and continued almost until the poet's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else.

    这句话是从GOOGLE上搜索出来的。

    作者: littlemuddie    时间: 2004-11-30 06:54

    我赞成 tulip 的说法。此句重心在 outnumber 上。

    主句是： .....letters .................outnumber her letters to anyone else.

    请指教。

    作者: tempture    时间: 2004-12-20 02:50
    你们不觉得A的outnumbering her letters中的her指代不清么？如果是E，和前面的Emily Dickinson’s 就对应的没有问题
    作者: gleaebb    时间: 2005-2-8 00:52

    http://www.parispress.org/level02/books/omc.html


    这句话的确可以google出来。


    Emily Dickinson's Intimate Letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson


    Edited by Ellen Louise Hart and Martha Nell Smith


    "Dickinson's surviving letters to Susan, which began ardently a few years before Susan's marriage and continued almost until the poet's death in 1886, outnumber her letters to anyone else. After an examination of these cryptic messages, Ellen Louise Hart and Martha Nell Smith have emerged up in arms for Susan.......



    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-8 1:04:44编辑过]
    作者: michellechang    时间: 2005-8-26 00:32

    我觉得AE是意思上的区别，还是E比较符合逻辑，请大家体会下

    作者: jackdua_cn    时间: 2005-9-17 12:17

    outnumbering 做伴随状语不合适


    作者: Tono    时间: 2006-1-2 11:32

    我觉得A,E也不对.大家没觉得a period beginning...and ending...中不应使用v-ing么?v-ing不是表示的是持续的,无具体时间的意义么,而这里显然是需要指明明确的开始与结束的时间的啊,我觉得应该用从句.所以做题时发现五个选项都有问题,没有好选的了.



      

    作者: Tono    时间: 2006-1-2 11:35

    好多错题大家都争得不可开交,到底有没有正确的解释啊,好郁闷!!有的题都讨论了好几年了..


    作者: Hyi_unicent    时间: 2006-2-5 16:19
    以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-28 19:58:00的发言：

    A的主句是系表结构，mumuwa的例子里的主句是动宾结构。所以本题和mumuwa的例子是2回事。


    outnumbering是伴随动作还是结果？A的系表结构导致了无法判定outnumbering的意义。


    所以只有E是对的。


    remarks expecting......


    有道理.

    句子的重心应该是说数量上超过....

    前面有朋友提过,LETTERS OUTNUMBER LETTERS的说法是不对的. 大家可以查查,OUTNUMBER本身是指数量超过.看到过一句话EATHS OUTNUMBER BIRTHS,指的是死亡的人数超过出生的人数.

    我认为是E

    作者: harlequin    时间: 2006-2-5 17:09
    以下是引用Tono在2006-1-2 11:32:00的发言：

    我觉得A,E也不对.大家没觉得a period beginning...and ending...中不应使用v-ing么?v-ing不是表示的是持续的,无具体时间的意义么,而这里显然是需要指明明确的开始与结束的时间的啊,我觉得应该用从句.所以做题时发现五个选项都有问题,没有好选的了.


      


    重心，伴随的问题算是解决了，这个问题还真是个问题呢！

    作者: wycg    时间: 2006-2-5 20:46

    同意选E.(个人看法)


    参见前人讲的.


    作者: demon_hunter    时间: 2006-7-9 15:41
    以下是引用九山环一湖在2004-6-27 16:18:00的发言：

    Q31:

    Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

    1. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
    2. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
    3. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering
    4. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
    5. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

    E中的Dickinson是什么？？？
    Dickinson outnumber ....???
    请指教。

    作者: timsky2000    时间: 2006-7-16 14:15
    总觉得A中的which不好,有修饰Susan Huntington Dickinson 的嫌疑，虽说只有who能修饰人.但是要是读者是傻子,把Susan Huntington Dickinson 以为是个东西的话,那就.......
    作者: roric    时间: 2006-9-6 17:16
    以下是引用timsky2000在2006-7-16 14:15:00的发言：
    总觉得A中的which不好,有修饰Susan Huntington Dickinson 的嫌疑，虽说只有who能修饰人.但是要是读者是傻子,把Susan Huntington Dickinson 以为是个东西的话,那就.......

    which 后面是were,一定修饰letters,所以这是一个没有歧义的跳跃修饰
    作者: abort    时间: 2007-1-19 12:36
    a/e,俺看的头好晕，说说俺的想法，俺还是同意E，虽然不少nn举了例子说明应该是A，如

    259. Five fledgling sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.


        

    (A) bringing


        

    (B) and brings


        

    (C) and it brings


        

    (D) and it brought（A）


        

    (E) and brought

    上面的例子之所以选A是因为，前面的事造成了后面的结果，就是说五只鹰离开巢这件事bring了后面的结果，对应到本句就是小E给小S的信被写了很长时间这件事outnumber写给其他人的信，逻辑有很大的问题呀！！！


    作者: myoo    时间: 2007-3-9 22:26
    以下是引用abort在2007-1-19 12:36:00的发言：
    a/e,俺看的头好晕，说说俺的想法，俺还是同意E，虽然不少nn举了例子说明应该是A，如

    259. Five fledgling sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975.


     

    (A) bringing


     

    (B) and brings


     

    (C) and it brings


     

    (D) and it brought（A）


     

    (E) and brought

    上面的例子之所以选A是因为，前面的事造成了后面的结果，就是说五只鹰离开巢这件事bring了后面的结果，对应到本句就是小E给小S的信被写了很长时间这件事outnumber写给其他人的信，逻辑有很大的问题呀！！！


    楼上说的有道理。伴随应该表结果
    作者: bigmachine    时间: 2007-6-12 10:22

    分词的ing 形式 表示经常反复发生的动作，定语从句表示在特定条件发生的动作，好像有这么一说。

    如果这样的话A的outnumbering 就显得不合适了，它不是经常反复发生的，而是一个事实。

    作者: bbxiaos    时间: 2007-12-5 07:11

    Q31:

    Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.

    1. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
              
    2. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
              
    3. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering
              
    4. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
              
    5. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

    这题选E的话outnumber不用用过去时么？？

    作者: lulu_odin    时间: 2008-5-3 10:55
    作者: MarilynR    时间: 2008-6-8 01:58
    以下是引用bbxiaos在2007-12-5 7:11:00的发言：

    Q31:

    这题选E的话outnumber不用用过去时么？？

    同感。有此疑问。

    如果说which的跳跃修饰我还可以勉强接受，可是这个时态问题要着呢么理解呢？

    作者: watergood    时间: 2009-6-19 16:34

    outnumber用一般现在来叙述一个客观事实。时态的选择在这里问题不大

    作者: oliverchen84    时间: 2009-7-18 19:55
    以下是引用roric在2006/9/6 17:16:00的发言：

    which 后面是were,一定修饰letters,所以这是一个没有歧义的跳跃修饰

    which 歧义是结构性的，能不能用单复数来排除歧义啊？

    作者: nightmare177    时间: 2010-9-1 20:28
    GMAT . GOD MADE A TEST


    、这个题目 oa 说是E， 但是我错了好几次，都执着的选了A（虽然我知道OA是E）

    感觉 有些争论题， 不要为了 一个题目的对错，放弃自己的语法理解，得不偿失



    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3