ChaseDream

标题: GWD7-35,36 [打印本页]

作者: zj1983    时间: 2004-6-27 12:52
标题: GWD7-35,36

Q34 to Q36:


      Firms traditionally claim that they


       downsize (i.e., make permanent


       personnel cuts) for economic reasons,


Line       laying off supposedly unnecessary staff


  (5)      in an attempt to become more efficient


and competitive.  Organization theory


would explain this reasoning as an


example of the “economic rationality”


that it assumes underlies all organi-


(10)      zational activities.  There is evidence


that firms believe they are behaving


rationally whenever they downsize; yet


recent research has shown that the


actual economic effects of downsizing


(15)      are often negative for firms.  Thus,


organization theory cannot adequately


explain downsizing; non-economic


factors must also be considered.


One such factor is the evolution of


(20)      downsizing into a powerful business


       myth:  managers simply believe that


       downsizing is efficacious.  Moreover,


downsizing nowadays is greeted


favorably by the business press; the


(25)      press often refers to soaring stock


prices of downsizing firms (even though


research shows that stocks usually


rise only briefly after downsizing and


then suffer a prolonged decline).


(30)      Once viewed as a sign of desperation,


downsizing is now viewed as a signal


that firms are serious about competing


       in the global marketplace; such signals


are received positively by key actors—


(35)    financial analysts, consultants,


shareholders—who supply firms with


vital organizing resources.  Thus, even


if downsizers do not become economi-


      cally more efficient, downsizing’s mythic


(40)     properties give them added prestige


in the business community, enhancing


their survival prospects.


Q35:


The passage suggests that downsizing’s mythic properties can be beneficial to a downsizing firm because these properties


              



  • allow the firm to achieve significant operating efficiencies

  • provide the firm with access to important organizing resources

  • encourage a long-term increase in the firm’s stock price

  • make the firm less reliant on external figures such as financial analysts and consultants

  • discourage the firm’s competitors from entering the global marketplace

  • Answer: B我选A



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Q36:


    The passage suggests which of the following about the claim that a firm will become more efficient and competitive by downsizing?


                  



  • Few firms actually believe this claim to be true.

  • Fewer firms have been making this claim in recent years.

  • This claim contradicts the basic assumption of organization theory.

  • This claim is called into question by certain recent research.

  • This claim is often treated with skepticism by the business press.

  • Answer: E我选D


    作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-27 19:50

    35, A is better in that the text"such signals are received positively by key actors—  financial analysts, consultants, shareholders—who supply firms with vital organizing resources. "  suggests it.  Remember, such verbs as suggest, infer, imply means we should deduct or reason something out from text, not find the word explicitly from inside text.

    36, I stand with for this question. D should be the key of this subject.


    作者: robertchu    时间: 2004-6-28 13:41

    Here are my picks: B, D.


    Taiwan, do you mean B for Q35?


    Q35: downsizing’s mythic properties can be beneficial to a downsizing firm because "downsizing is now viewed as a signal ...; such signals are received positively by key actors ...who supply firms with vital organizing resources."


    Q36: D is right.  "yet recent research has shown that the actual economic effects of downsizing  are often negative for firms"


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-28 13:41:40编辑过]

    作者: rhod    时间: 2004-7-2 20:04
    Agree B and D.
    作者: fair_sword    时间: 2004-7-13 21:55

    B, D


    作者: nanalin    时间: 2004-8-14 04:31

    Q34:


    The primary purpose of the passage is to


                   



    1. criticize firms for engaging in the practice of downsizing


    2. analyze the negative economic impact of downsizing on firms

    3. offer an alternative to a traditional explanation for the occurrence of downsizing


    4. chronicle how perceptions of downsizing have changed over time

    5. provide evidence disputing the prevalence of downsizing

    请问Q34. 文章没有criticize实行downsizing的公司吗?


    这题我选A.... 请告诉我思路哪错了 谢谢


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-8-14 4:40:59编辑过]

    作者: tony6    时间: 2004-8-19 12:07

    criticize firms for engaging in the practice of downsizing ,

    不是针对公司,而是针对这个practice进行评价。


    作者: msfox    时间: 2004-12-8 14:43

    B, D


    顺便提醒斑竹阅读GWD汇总里的链接错了。本贴链到GWD9-35里了。


    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-9 20:44:25编辑过]

    作者: happythree    时间: 2005-1-20 10:21
    yet

    recent research has shown that the

    actual economic effects of downsizing

    (15)      are often negative for firms.

    But there is no content about the negative aspects in the following text. So what is the logical line about the passage. Thank you.


    作者: longvacation    时间: 2005-2-9 11:20
    以下是引用nanalin在2004-8-14 4:31:00的发言:

    Q34:


    The primary purpose of the passage is to


                   



    1. criticize firms for engaging in the practice of downsizing


    2. analyze the negative economic impact of downsizing on firms

    3. offer an alternative to a traditional explanation for the occurrence of downsizing


    4. chronicle how perceptions of downsizing have changed over time

    5. provide evidence disputing the prevalence of downsizing

    请问Q34. 文章没有criticize实行downsizing的公司吗?


    这题我选A.... 请告诉我思路哪错了 谢谢



    D为什么不对呢?
    作者: agape0417    时间: 2005-3-7 22:55

    文中沒有使用時間來作為討論主軸

    再體會一下吧


    作者: winsx2008    时间: 2005-4-28 21:47
    提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
    作者: calla    时间: 2005-5-26 18:57

    GWD-9-Q33:


    The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that the “caution” (line 29) urged


    by de Ricqlès regarding claims about dinosaur physiology was


    A. unjustified by the evidence available to de Ricqlès


    B. unnecessary, given the work done by Bakker and his followers


    C. indicative of the prevailing scientific opinion at the time


    D. warranted, given certain subsequent findings of other scientists


    E. influential in the recent work of Chinsamy


    这题的答案为什么是D呢?并没有warranted啊


    This question remains


    (60)  unanswered; indeed, taking all the evidence


    into account, one cannot make


    a definitive statement about dinosaur


    physiology on the basis of dinosaur


    bone. It may be that dinosaurs had an


    (65) intermediate pattern of bone structure


    because their physiology was neither


    typically reptilian, mammalian, nor avian.



    我选E。其实我自己觉得E也不是很好,只是不知道到底应该选哪个。


    作者: 小女公子    时间: 2005-5-31 14:33
    报告斑竹,这个连接是gwd7 的阅读,放在gwd9里面了…………
    作者: remona9t    时间: 2005-6-7 14:50
    c,b,d
    作者: fchn951    时间: 2005-6-17 15:00

    GWD-7-Q34:


    The primary purpose of the passage is to


                            



    1. criticize firms for engaging in the practice of downsizing


    2. analyze the negative economic impact of downsizing on firms


    3. offer an alternative to a traditional explanation for the occurrence of downsizing


    4. chronicle how perceptions of downsizing have changed over time


    5. provide evidence disputing the prevalence of downsizing


    Answer:


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    GWD-7-Q35:


    The passage suggests that downsizing’s mythic properties can be beneficial to a downsizing firm because these properties


                            



    1. allow the firm to achieve significant operating efficiencies


    2. provide the firm with access to important organizing resources


    3. encourage a long-term increase in the firm’s stock price


    4. make the firm less reliant on external figures such as financial analysts and consultants


    5. discourage the firm’s competitors from entering the global marketplace


    Answer:



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    GWD-7-Q36:


    The passage suggests which of the following about the claim that a firm will become more efficient and competitive by downsizing?


                            



    1. Few firms actually believe this claim to be true.


    2. Fewer firms have been making this claim in recent years.


    3. This claim contradicts the basic assumption of organization theory.


    4. This claim is called into question by certain recent research.


    5. This claim is often treated with skepticism by the business press.


    Answer:


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    GWD-7-Q37:


    According to the passage, the “key actors” (line 34) view a firm’s downsizing activities as an indication of the firm’s




    1. troubled financial condition


    2. inability to develop effective long-term strategies


    3. inability to retain vital organizational resources


    4. desire to boost its stock price


    desire to become more competitive



    答案CBDE


    作者: ziwingfong    时间: 2005-7-22 12:37

    那到底35是A还是B呢?


    作者: windlake    时间: 2005-8-10 15:17

    37题是E吗?答案给的是B,不过我也是选E


    downsizing is now viewed as a signal


    that firms are serious about competing



    in the global marketplace;


    作者: Fat_fish    时间: 2005-10-10 05:29
    35为什么选B啊,还是不懂的说
    作者: leonchan    时间: 2005-10-10 20:11

    The passage suggests that downsizing's mythic properties can be beneficial to a downsizing firm because these properties


    such signals
    are received positively by key actors—
    (35)  financial analysts, consultants,
    shareholders—who supply firms with
    vital organizing resources
    . Thus, even
    if downsizers do not become economi-
    cally more efficient, downsizing’s mythic
    (40) properties
    give them added prestige
    in the business community
    ,
    enhancing
    their survival prospects.


    B. provide the firm with access to important organizing resources


    作者: Fat_fish    时间: 2005-10-13 00:06
    你的意思是...... B对? (35题, 楼上的说)
    作者: erudite66    时间: 2005-10-28 16:22

    我也选A


    C 说  为现在downsizing发生的解释提供另外一种解释,但是文章中说 Other factors 必须考虑,然后说


    One such factor is the evolution of downsizing into a powerful business myth



    因此,可以推断应该有很多的解释,而不是c说的一种




    作者: wzparete    时间: 2006-2-16 23:38

    大家有没有注意35A中:operating efficiencies 文章没提过的,我想operating efficiencies 和efficiencies 是不同的吧,A应该不对。


    另外mythic properties告诉我们:要到L40定位,紧记定位解体。


    支持B。


    作者: ww99929    时间: 2006-8-24 19:52

    Q34-的C 说 occurrence of downsizing,全文说的是downsizing的出现吗?我怎么觉得是Downsizing的效果呀。

     


    作者: 莫菲    时间: 2007-5-21 10:02

    对啊!我也是这么认为的,所以选B,谁能告诉我B为什么不对呢?


    作者: Drakedirect    时间: 2007-8-7 10:51
    楼上的mm,文中虽然有提到negative effect, 但是没有继续,而是说non-economic 必须被考虑,紧接着one of such factors is blablabal....
    yet
    recent research has shown that the
        

    actual economic effects of downsizing


        


                    (15)      are often negative for firms.  Thus,


        

    organization theory cannot adequately


        

    explain downsizing;
                non-economic


        

    factors must also be considered.


        

    One such factor is the evolution of


        


                    (20)      downsizing into a powerful business


        

           myth:  managers simply believe that


        

           downsizing is efficacious.  Moreover,


        

    downsizing nowadays is greeted


        

    favorably by the business press; the


        


                    (25)      press often refers to soaring stock


        

    prices of downsizing firms (even though


        

    research shows that stocks usually


        

    rise only briefly after downsizing and


        

    then suffer a prolonged decline).


        


                    (30)      Once viewed as a sign of desperation,


        

    downsizing is now viewed as a signal


        

    that firms are serious about competing


        

           in the global marketplace; such signals


        

    are received positively by key actors—


        


                    (35)    financial analysts, consultants,


        

    shareholders—who supply firms with


        

    vital organizing resources.  Thus, even


        

    if downsizers do not become economi-


        

          cally more efficient, downsizing’s mythic


        


                    (40)     properties give them added prestige


        

    in the business community, enhancing


        

    their survival prospects.


    作者: Drakedirect    时间: 2007-8-7 12:04
    Once viewed as a sign of desperation,
        

    downsizing is now viewed as a signal


        

    that firms are serious about competing


        

           in the global marketplace; such signals


        

    are received positively by key actors—


        


                    (35)    financial analysts, consultants,


        

    shareholders—who supply firms with


        

    vital organizing resources.  Thus, even


        

    if downsizers do not become economi-


        

          cally more efficient, downsizing’s mythic


        


                    (40)     properties give them added prestige


        

    in the business community, enhancing


        

    their survival prospects.

    那位xdjm可以帮我翻译一下这句话,牛牛们说Q35的B选项出自此处, 为什么我看不出来 ?谢谢....


    [此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-7 12:07:33编辑过]

    作者: wangwei8581    时间: 2007-8-22 02:45

    这篇文章我读了十几遍,我对36题提出质疑!

    我认为应该选C!!!!

    the claim that a firm will become more efficient and competitive by downsizing,

    这句claim没错,错的是理论根据,traditional organizational theory 不能解释之,但是新的理论可以,

    C说该claim和organizational theory的前提相悖,是正确答案!


    [此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-22 2:45:57编辑过]

    作者: karen_bai19    时间: 2007-9-8 16:28

    强烈支持ls36题的答案,有nn出来确认一下吗?


    作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-10-20 17:03

    唉,明白了……


    作者: yuanzi15    时间: 2008-5-11 11:56
    定位到L40了,还是不明白为什么选B
    作者: yuanzi15    时间: 2008-5-11 19:45
    up
    作者: smiling_cd    时间: 2009-1-10 06:36
    以下是引用wangwei8581在2007-8-22 2:45:00的发言:

    这篇文章我读了十几遍,我对36题提出质疑!

    我认为应该选C!!!!

    the claim that a firm will become more efficient and competitive by downsizing,

    这句claim没错,错的是理论根据,traditional organizational theory 不能解释之,但是新的理论可以,

    C说该claim和organizational theory的前提相悖,是正确答案!


    文章并没什么有说明OT的前提 underlies all organization activities 是怎么不对的啊?并没有 过多的讨论这个前提有什么问题

    顺便问,Q35. 我同意说,dowsizing as a signal received by the key actors. 可是我觉得这个和选项 provide the firm with access to 这些actors 意思也不一样啊。 前者是说这些引起actors注意,可能会调节公司,可是后者的意思不是 let the firm access to actors? 还是我对access的理解错误?这句话应该怎么理解啊?


    作者: wxxwnx    时间: 2009-2-9 23:04

    浅见:回复楼上,access to resources,不是to actors,这些resources是important organizing resources,对应vital organizing resources.这些io resources由actors supply, 对应provide,这些actors是fas,cs,ss.


    作者: wu41385621    时间: 2009-7-27 11:00

    ding


    作者: Brilliance    时间: 2009-7-30 20:58





    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3