ChaseDream
标题: 【OG--126】定语就近修饰的问题 [打印本页]
作者: bigfourGAKKI 时间: 2011-6-20 18:59
标题: 【OG--126】定语就近修饰的问题
126. The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.
(A) that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses
(B) that creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
(C) creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses
(D) to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious
(E) who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
此题选A。解答中桌划线部分的that从句修饰reactions,that指代的是reactions。想问:定语从句不是修饰就近的名词吗?也就是individual啊~ 为何是修饰reaction呢。而且我默默觉得修饰individual逻辑貌似也通啊... individual creates responses?
麻烦指教!!!谢谢啦!
作者: colasama 时间: 2011-6-20 19:54
这个..好像只有从逻辑上能解释了。
individual产生responses应该不会用create这个动词。用have之类的比较搭
作者: lonelyorchid 时间: 2011-6-21 10:23
126. The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual
that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.
(A) that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses
(B) that creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
(C) creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses
(D) to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious
(E) who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
此题选A。解答中桌划线部分的that从句修饰reactions,that指代的是reactions。想问:定语从句不是修饰就近的名词吗?也就是individual啊~ 为何是修饰reaction呢。而且我默默觉得修饰individual逻辑貌似也通啊... individual creates responses?
麻烦指教!!!谢谢啦!
-- by 会员 bigfourGAKKI (2011/6/20 18:59:53)
that的指代是有优先级之分的,优先指代动宾,其次才是介宾。which的指代没有优先级之分,只能指代最近的名词
作者: bigfourGAKKI 时间: 2011-6-21 15:47
[/quote]
that的指代是有优先级之分的,优先指代动宾,其次才是介宾。which的指代没有优先级之分,只能指代最近的名词-- by 会员 lonelyorchid (2011/6/21 10:23:40)
[/quote]
哇!谢谢楼上两位啦!还有,想请教下lonelyorchid,这个语法点是在哪儿看到的啊?THX!
作者: brightpath 时间: 2011-6-21 18:27
126. The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual
that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.
(A) that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses
(B) that creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
(C) creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses
(D) to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious
(E) who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
此题选A。解答中桌划线部分的that从句修饰reactions,that指代的是reactions。想问:定语从句不是修饰就近的名词吗?也就是individual啊~ 为何是修饰reaction呢。而且我默默觉得修饰individual逻辑貌似也通啊... individual creates responses?
麻烦指教!!!谢谢啦!
-- by 会员 bigfourGAKKI (2011/6/20 18:59:53)
从逻辑意义上看unconscious physiological responses修饰emotional reactions(注意unconscious )
因为reactions是复数形式,所动词必须是单数
所以排除 B和E
C > emotional reactions in an individual creating..... 结构中creating不是指代词,只能修饰前面的名词individual
individual creating 不符合原句想表达的逻辑意思。
D> individual to create 错误同 C
小总结:A 介词短语that C 结构中(像 A of B that C;A in B that C 等等) C具体修饰A 还是 B,取决于C后面句子的意思与A 或 B的逻辑关系。
作者: lonelyorchid 时间: 2011-6-22 11:23
126. The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual
that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.
(A) that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses
(B) that creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
(C) creating, in turn, unconscious physiological responses
(D) to create, in turn, physiological responses that are unconscious
(E) who creates unconscious physiological responses in turn
此题选A。解答中桌划线部分的that从句修饰reactions,that指代的是reactions。想问:定语从句不是修饰就近的名词吗?也就是individual啊~ 为何是修饰reaction呢。而且我默默觉得修饰individual逻辑貌似也通啊... individual creates responses?
麻烦指教!!!谢谢啦!
-- by 会员 bigfourGAKKI (2011/6/20 18:59:53)
从逻辑意义上看unconscious physiological responses修饰emotional reactions(注意unconscious )
因为reactions是复数形式,所动词必须是单数
所以排除 B和E
C > emotional reactions in an individual creating..... 结构中creating不是指代词,只能修饰前面的名词individual
individual creating 不符合原句想表达的逻辑意思。
D> individual to create 错误同 C
小总结:
A 介词短语that C 结构中(像
A of B that C;
A in B that C 等等) C具体修饰A 还是 B,取决于C后面句子的意思与A 或 B的逻辑关系。
-- by 会员 brightpath (2011/6/21 18:27:09)
that绝对是修饰A的。记得that和it的区别么,和这个也是有类似情况的 that 修饰 A, it修饰 A prep. B,which 修饰B。这样才分工明确。不然如果修饰的内容都要通过逻辑来判断,那不就不会出现指代错误的问题了?
欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) |
Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |