标题: 哪位大好人帮解答一下这道BF逻辑题TAT [打印本页] 作者: 许楚iris 时间: 2011-6-17 10:45 标题: 哪位大好人帮解答一下这道BF逻辑题TAT Environmental organization want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability. A.The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection. E.The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future. 答案是E，我选的是A，我觉得A更贴合原文啊，我觉得这个作者是更同意a more sensible preservation strategy的。。是我理解错了吗？作者: colasama 时间: 2011-6-17 11:45
从第一句黑脸就能判断答案了。 第一句只是说了一个goal，没提到用什么方法实现。 作者实际上赞同要保护该地的goal，只是认为“买地”这个方法不好，提出了另外一个方法。
The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived，说goal 本身ill-conceived,明显就说错了作者: 许楚iris 时间: 2011-6-20 22:17
啊。。明白了。。O(∩_∩)O谢谢作者: lynnzhou83 时间: 2011-9-5 00:10
在GWD24中 答案是D啊。。。。